Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40654503›Full record

ArticleJournal of mood and anxiety disorders2024

Anhedonia influences threat avoidance and relief: A conceptual replication.

Lu Leng, Tom Beckers, Bram Vervliet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mood and anxiety disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lu LengCenter for the Psychology of Learning and Experimental Psychopathology, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Tom BeckersCenter for the Psychology of Learning and Experimental Psychopathology, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Bram VervlietLaboratory of Biological Psychology, KU Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active threat avoidance is an adaptive coping strategy but can evolve into maladaptive behavior patterns when it is disproportionate to an actual threat. While excessive and persistent avoidance, as often seen in anxiety-related disorders, have been investigated extensively, it is presently unclear under what circumstances insufficient avoidance might occur in the presence of a genuine threat. We hypothesized that anhedonia, the reduced ability to experience pleasure, might undermine the relief experience after successful threat avoidance and thus reduce future active avoidance responses. Using an established avoidance learning paradigm, we examined the relationship between anhedonia, relief, and active avoidance responses. Forty participants learned that two threat cues signaled electrical stimulation and they could click a button during cue presentations to prevent electrical stimulation from occurring. While clicking the button worked for one threat cue, it did not work for the other one. After several repetitions, button effectiveness was reversed. Another safety cue that never signaled electrical stimulation was presented intermixed with the two threat cues. Every time there was an omission of electrical stimulation, self-reported relief was measured. We found that participants who scored higher on anhedonia experienced weaker relief during all outcome omissions. Behaviorally, at the early stage of each phase, participants who scored higher on anhedonia executed fewer avoidance actions, specifically for the threat cue that signaled avoidable electrical stimulation. Relief induced by threat omission is a pleasant experience, which trait anhedonia seems to impair. This attenuation of relief might reduce the reinforcement of future adaptive avoidance behaviors.

Indexed as

AnhedoniaReliefThreat avoidance

Identifiers

PMID40654503
PMCPMC12244109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.