ArticleJournal of dental sciences2025
Effects of 3D-printers and manufacturer-specified post-curing units on the dimensional accuracy, compressive strength, and degree of conversion of resin for fixed dental prostheses.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of post-curing level and phosphorylcholine modification on a 3D-printable resin for definitive crowns.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing in Dentistry: Evolution, Technologies, and Clinical Application.Polymers · 2026Review
- A Review of Current Systems, Materials, and Protocols for 3D-Printed Splints, Crowns, and Dentures.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026Review
- Effect of Immersion in Quaternary Ammonium Methacryloxy Silane Mixed Monomer on the Mechanical Properties and Antibacterial Activity of a 3D-Printed Urethane Dimethacrylate Denture Base Resin.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: The 3D printer and post-curing unit are important factors in producing the best 3D printed crowns. To explore the effects of different combinations of 3D-printers and manufacturer-specified post-curing units on the dimensional accuracy, compressive strength, and degree of conversion (DC%) of 3D-printable resin for fixed dental prostheses. Materials and methods: Specimens were designed in 2 sizes and additively-manufactured using 2 digital light processing (DLP) 3D-printers (NextDent 5100, ND and PrintinDLP+, PN). The 3D-printed samples were polymerized using 2 different post curing units (LC-3D Print box, N and PrintInCure+, P). Dimensional accuracy was evaluated under an optical microscope, while compressive strength was determined using a universal testing machine. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was used to analyze the resin molecular bond characteristics and DC%. Statistical analysis, including ANOVA and Tukey's HSD post-hoc tests ( Results: Significant dimensional variations were observed for both square and rectangular samples ( Conclusion: Post-curing units had a greater impact on dimensional accuracy, strength, and polymerization than the choice of 3D-printer. Optimal resin properties require careful optimization of post-curing parameters and equipment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.