ArticleJournal of dental sciences2025
A scientometric study on research trends and characteristics of salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A scientometric study on research trends and characteristics of mucoepidermoid carcinoma of salivary glands.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma (SACC) affects the major salivary glands and minor salivary glands mainly within the oral cavity. The purpose of this study was to analyze the scientometric characteristics and research trends of SACC. Materials and methods: All the papers on SACC were comprehensively retrieved from the Scopus database. The years of publication were divided into before 2015 and 2015-2024 in the analysis of research trends. Results: There were 2406 papers on SACC, with total citations of 54,921 and the Conclusion: This study for the first time elucidated the current scenario and scientometric characteristics of SACC, and would help in improving in reciprocal collaboration and provide helpful guidance for further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.