ArticleJournal of dental sciences2025
Investigating the relation among the needle insertion plane, occlusal plane, mandibular foramen, and mandibular lingula for inferior alveolar nerve block.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of 4% Articaine with Profound Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Success in Third Molar Surgery Performed by Dental Students: A Three-Anesthetic Observational Study.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Imaging Evaluation for Jaw Deformities: Diagnostic Workup and Pre-Treatment Imaging Checklist for Orthognathic Surgery.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: The success rates and incidence of positive blood aspiration during inferior alveolar nerve blocks (IANB) vary. Understanding the relative positions of the mandibular foramen (MF), mandibular lingula (ML), and occlusal plane (OP) is crucial for the effectiveness and safety of IANB. This study evaluates the relationship among needle insertion levels, ML, and OP for IANB. Materials and methods: Cone-beam computed tomography images of 90 participants were analyzed to measure ML and MF distances relative to OP. Participants were categorized into skeletal classes (I, II, and III). The distances from ML to the anesthetic needle positioned 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 mm above OP were assessed. Comparisons based on gender and skeletal classes were conducted, and correlations among variables were evaluated. Results: The MF and ML were located below OP in 72 (40.0 %) and 5 (2.8 %) sides, respectively. Class II had the highest proportion of MF below OP (16.67 %), followed by Class III (13.33 %) and Class I (10 %). When the needle was inserted 5 mm and 10 mm above OP, ML was below the insertion plane in 27 (15 %) and 116 (64.4 %) sides, respectively. ML-OP distances were significantly greater in Class III (9.75 mm) and Class I (9.62 mm) than in Class II (7.29 mm). Conclusion: Class II exhibited significantly smaller ML-OP and MF-OP distances than Class I and Class III. The needle should be inserted parallel to OP and positioned approximately 6-7 mm above OP for improved safety and anesthesia efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.