ArticleJournal of dental sciences2025
Multivariable analysis of use of absorbable collagen sponge graft for maxillary sinus floor elevation and augmentation.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The influence of maxillary lateral wall thickness on the alveolar horizontal bone dimension after lateral sinus elevation without bone grafts: A retrospective study.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Various studies have shown that use of absorbable collagen sponge (ACS) in maxillary sinus augmentation promotes new bone formation. This study aimed to assess changes in bone height of the maxillary sinus floor and to identify factors associated with these changes when performing sinus augmentation using ACS. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent simultaneous implant placement and maxillary sinus augmentation using ACS through a crestal (CA) or lateral (LA) approach. Changes in bone height at 12 months (G2, primary outcomes) were evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography. Factors associated with these changes were evaluated, including age, sex, smoking, location, span, number of ACSs, sinus perforation, sinus membrane elevation height, and residual bone height. Variables significantly associated with G2 were evaluated by multivariable analyses based on the generalized estimating equation. Results: Overall, 108 patients were evaluated, including at 182 implant sites (CA, 53; LA, 129). G2 was 2.16 ± 1.51 mm (residual bone height, 8.11 ± 1.58 mm) and 4.62 ± 2.04 mm (residual bone height, 5.54 ± 2.52 mm) in the CA and LA, respectively ( Conclusion: Clinicians need to make efforts to sufficiently elevate the sinus membrane and minimize perforations in order to achieve desired levels of new bone formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.