ArticleJournal of dental sciences2025
Exploring the correlation between dental procedures and trigemino-cardiac reflex.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Limitations of bibliometric analysis: Evidences from trigeminocardiac reflex published in Journal of Dental Sciences.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: /purpose: The trigemino-cardiac reflex (TCR) is a brainstem reflex characterized by sudden reductions in heart rate (HR) and mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) following trigeminal nerve stimulation. Although well-documented in other surgical fields, its role during dental procedures remains unclear. This study examined the association between routine dental interventions and TCR using an experimental animal model. Materials and methods: This study presented a comprehensive analysis of physiological monitoring data obtained during a series of animal experimental surgeries conducted by our research team between 2016 and 2023. Changes in HR and MABP during routine dental procedures were evaluated using two male Beagle dogs and six Lee-Sung miniature swine. Results: No significant changes in HR or MABP were observed during the scaling procedures. In contrast, root canal treatments showed the highest TCR incidence, with simultaneous HR and MABP decreases exceeding 15 % in 9.6 % of cases and 20 % in 5.6 % of cases. Tooth extraction triggered TCR in 2.7 % of 36 cases, while implant placement did not result in simultaneous HR and MABP reductions, but notable HR fluctuations were observed. Conclusion: This study indicates that discomfort experienced during dental scaling is unlikely to induce TCR, whereas root canal treatment, involving both physical and chemical stimulation, appears more likely to trigger its occurrence. Tooth extraction may similarly provoke TCR through mechanical stimulation. Although implant placement does not result in a simultaneous reduction in HR and MABP exceeding 15 % in this study, significant HR fluctuations greater than 20 % were observed, potentially representing early signs of TCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.