ArticleJournal of dental sciences2025
Evaluation of the effects for root resorption in orthodontic tooth movement with micro-osteoperforations in mice.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell Death in Orthodontic Tooth Movement: Recent Advances and Emerging Insights.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Mesenchymal stem cells derived from gingiva normoxic or hypoxic-preconditioning allogenous transplantation affect orthodontic tooth movement in vivo.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- A scientometric study on research trends and characteristics of randomized controlled trials in orthodontics.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in the Role of Osteocytes in Orthodontic Tooth Movement.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Docosahexaenoic Acid Inhibits Osteoclastogenesis via FFAR4-Mediated Regulation of Inflammatory Cytokines.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Comparative analysis of apical root resorption induced by different intrusion mechanics: A scanning electron microscopy study.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Orthodontic treatment is one of the most demanding procedures available for both patients and clinicians. The challenges stem from the extended duration to achieve desired results, often necessitating surgical interventions, such as micro-osteoperforations (MOPs). This study aimed to investigate the biological effects and extent of changes resulting from these interventions. Specifically, we evaluated the degree of root resorption during orthodontic tooth movement accelerated by MOPs. Materials and methods: We assessed the tooth movement rates and root resorption in eight-to ten-week-old male mice. A nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) closed-coil spring was applied between the maxillary left first molar and maxillary incisors. In the MOPs group, micro-perforations were made on the mesial and palatal surfaces of the left maxillary first molar. Odontoclast formation and root resorption were assessed using histological analysis and scanning electron microscopy. Results: Tooth movement was greater in the MOPs group. Odontoclast formation was remarkably higher in this group than in the orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) group. Additionally, more extensive root resorption was observed on the mesial surface of the distobuccal root of the left maxillary first molar. Conclusion: Root resorption significantly increased in mice with MOPs. These findings highlight the need to carefully consider the risk of root resorption in patients undergoing MOPs during orthodontic treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.