Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40654395›Full record

ArticleJNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association2024

Piloting Implementation Design and Preliminary Readiness for Universal Suicide Risk Screening Program in Emergency Department of a Tertiary Care Centre, Nepal: A Mixed-Method Study.

Anmol Purna Shrestha, Roshana Shrestha, Renu Shakya, Pratiksha Paudel, Madeleine Sorenson, Amrita Gurung, Riya Bajracharya, Ajay Risal, Lakshmi Vijayakumar, Ashley Hagaman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anmol Purna ShresthaDepartment of General Practice and Emergency Medicine, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Kavre, Nepal.
Roshana ShresthaDepartment of General Practice and Emergency Medicine, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Kavre, Nepal.
Renu ShakyaDepartment or Community Programs, Dhulikhel Hospital-Kathmandu University Hospital, Kavre, Nepal.
Pratiksha PaudelDepartment or Community Programs, Dhulikhel Hospital-Kathmandu University Hospital, Kavre, Nepal.
Madeleine SorensonSociaf and Behavioral Science Department, Yale School of Public Health, Connecticut, USA.
Amrita GurungDepartment of Psychology, Padma Kanya Campus, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.
Riya BajracharyaDepartment or Community Programs, Dhulikhel Hospital-Kathmandu University Hospital, Kavre, Nepal.
Ajay RisalDepartment of Psychiatry, Dhulikhel Hospital-Kathmandu University Hospital, Kavre, Nepal.
Lakshmi VijayakumarDepartment of Psychiatry, Volunteer Health Services Hospital, Chennai, India.
Ashley HagamanSociaf and Behavioral Science Department, Yale School of Public Health, Connecticut, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Nearly three quarters of the suicides occur in developing world, however few evidence-based health systems strategies exist to detect and prevent suicide in these contexts. This pilot study evaluates the feasibility of implementing a universal suicide risk screening program in a Nepalese emergency department. Methods: This study reports the preliminary training phases of a pilot implementation trial in the emergency department to evaluate the program. The approval was obtained from the Nepal Health Research Council (Approval no. 447/2021 P), and the Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences Institutional Ethical Review Board (Approval no. 237/2021) and Yale University IRB (Protocol ID 2000029480). Implementation assessments included suicide screening acceptability, appropriateness, confidence, system priority, and myth knowledge of staff. Implementation strategies were selected, decolonized, and preliminarily trained followed by phased supportive coaching to initiate the screening package. We designed the implementation package through co-design staff focus groups and embedded ethnography. Results: Co-design focus groups (n=8) occurred with staff and leadership. We trained 26 (76.47%) the staff on the Nepali suicide screening tool followed by supported phased initial screening over two months. Implementation assessments demonstrated increased scores on appropriateness, confidence, system priority, and myth knowledge. The implementation package included key strategies to be deployed over six months. The embedded ethnographic observations revealed barriers to effective implementation, such as anticipated stigma, reluctance to engage families, and distrust in referral processes. Conclusions: The pilot study demonstrated that training improves staff appropriateness, confidence, system priority, and myth knowledge. Despite initial barriers, co-designed strategies and phased coaching facilitates screening uptake, highlighting the program's potential for sustainable implementation.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalMass ScreeningSuicide PreventionAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleNepalPilot ProjectsRisk AssessmentTertiary Care Centersdeveloping worldemergency medicineimplementation scienceprevention

Identifiers

PMID40654395
PMCPMC11930060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.