Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40654241›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025

Association Between Prostate Cancer and Myocardial Infarction Management and Postinfarction Outcomes: A Norwegian Registry Study.

Rachel B Forster, Camilla Kjellstadli, Rupali Akerkar, Gerhard E Sulo, Tor Åge Myklebust, Øystein Karlstad, Tone Bjørge, Kaare H Bønaa, Ester Kringeland, Rune Kvåle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rachel B ForsterDepartment of Health Registry Research and Development Norwegian Institute of Public Health Bergen Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7952-3570
Camilla KjellstadliDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics Haukeland University Hospital Bergen Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1296-382X
Rupali AkerkarDepartment of Health Registries Norwegian Institute of Public Health Bergen Norway.
Gerhard E SuloDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care University of Bergen Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1247-1577
Tor Åge MyklebustDepartment of Registration, Cancer Registry of Norway Norwegian Institute of Public Health Oslo Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4645-1635
Øystein KarlstadDepartment of Chronic Diseases Norwegian Institute of Public Health Oslo Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1204-787X
Tone BjørgeDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care University of Bergen Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9096-5257
Kaare H BønaaDepartment of Cardiology, St. Olav's Hospital Trondheim University Hospital Trondheim Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6675-3724
Ester KringelandDepartment of Health Registry Research and Development Norwegian Institute of Public Health Bergen Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9015-741X
Rune KvåleDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics Haukeland University Hospital Bergen Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4106-230X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men in Norway. With improving survival rates, cardiovascular disease, including acute myocardial infarction (AMI), has emerged as a leading cause of morbidity and death among patients with PCa. PCa and cardiovascular disease have several important overlaps, including shared risk factors, and certain PCa treatments may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to compare rates of invasive management, in-hospital complications, major adverse cardiovascular events, reinfarction, and death, as well as prescription of guideline-recommended secondary prevention following an AMI, between patients with PCa and the general male population with AMI.

methodsNationwide registry-based data were used to identify all men aged 40 to 85 years in Norway who had their first AMI during 2013 to 2019. We compared outcomes after AMI between those diagnosed with localized PCa between 2004 and 2019 and the general AMI population using logistic and cause-specific Cox regression.

resultsA total of 34 362 patients with AMI were included, of whom 1405 (4.1%) had PCa. There were no significant differences in rates of invasive management or secondary medical treatment after AMI between patients with PCa and patients without cancer. Patients with PCa had a lower risk of overall in-hospital complications (odds ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.64-0.92]) but a higher risk of serious bleeding (odds ratio, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.08-2.44]). Major adverse cardiovascular event and reinfarction rates were similar between the groups. One-year survival was better in patients with PCa (hazard ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.69-0.98]).

conclusionsStandard AMI treatment protocols can be applied to patients with localized PCa, although increased attention to bleeding risk is warranted.

Indexed as

Myocardial InfarctionProstatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayRegistriesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSecondary Preventioncardiovascular diseaseepidemiologyprostate cancerregistry

Identifiers

PMID40654241
PMCPMC12533670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.