ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Association Between Prostate Cancer and Myocardial Infarction Management and Postinfarction Outcomes: A Norwegian Registry Study.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men in Norway. With improving survival rates, cardiovascular disease, including acute myocardial infarction (AMI), has emerged as a leading cause of morbidity and death among patients with PCa. PCa and cardiovascular disease have several important overlaps, including shared risk factors, and certain PCa treatments may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to compare rates of invasive management, in-hospital complications, major adverse cardiovascular events, reinfarction, and death, as well as prescription of guideline-recommended secondary prevention following an AMI, between patients with PCa and the general male population with AMI.
methodsNationwide registry-based data were used to identify all men aged 40 to 85 years in Norway who had their first AMI during 2013 to 2019. We compared outcomes after AMI between those diagnosed with localized PCa between 2004 and 2019 and the general AMI population using logistic and cause-specific Cox regression.
resultsA total of 34 362 patients with AMI were included, of whom 1405 (4.1%) had PCa. There were no significant differences in rates of invasive management or secondary medical treatment after AMI between patients with PCa and patients without cancer. Patients with PCa had a lower risk of overall in-hospital complications (odds ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.64-0.92]) but a higher risk of serious bleeding (odds ratio, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.08-2.44]). Major adverse cardiovascular event and reinfarction rates were similar between the groups. One-year survival was better in patients with PCa (hazard ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.69-0.98]).
conclusionsStandard AMI treatment protocols can be applied to patients with localized PCa, although increased attention to bleeding risk is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.