ArticlePersonality and mental health2025
An Investigation of Longitudinal Measurement Invariance and Item Response Theory Analysis of the LPFS-BF 2.0 in a Large Clinical Norwegian Sample.
Article in Personality and mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Self-Report and Structured Clinical Interview Scores for the Assessment of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale.Personality and mental health · 2026Article
- Clinical cut scores for the Farsi version of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Self-Report (LPFS-SR).BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Possible drivers of self-harm severity - relative contributions of post-traumatic stress and levels of personality functioning - results from the Extreme Challenges project.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- An Investigation of Longitudinal Measurement Invariance and Item Response Theory Analysis of the LPFS-BF 2.0 in a Large Clinical Norwegian Sample.Personality and mental health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The LPFS-BF 2.0 (Level of Personality Functioning-Brief Form 2.0) is a brief self-report instrument that was developed in order to gain a quick first impression of personality dysfunction and was designed to align with the Level of Personality Scale as outlined in the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD). In the current study, we used a factor analytic framework to evaluate the longitudinal measurement invariance of the Norwegian version of the LPFS-BF 2.0 in a sample of 1030 patients referred for personality disorder treatment with the R package lavaan. Additionally, we estimated item response theory (IRT) parameters for the 12 items, as well as local reliability, in order to facilitate comparisons with other studies. We found support for partial measurement invariance. Three items showed different thresholds across time points. However, these differences were minor and did not have a substantial impact on the estimated factor scores. The discrimination parameters were lower than could be expected for an instrument used in a clinical setting. Taking these findings together, we conclude that although the LPFS-BF 2.0 seems to measure the same latent trait across time, the items do not discriminate well between patients with high and low scores in a Norwegian population of adults seeking treatment for PD. Important next steps would be to estimate IRT parameters for comparable patient samples from other countries to assess the generalizability of our findings and to compare the LPFS-BF 2.0 scores to scores obtained through a clinical interview that aligns with the AMPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.