Observational studyArthritis care & research2025
Where, How, and How Much? A Multicenter Cohort Study of the Relationship Across Lupus Decision-Aid Modality, Place of Administration, Interruption and Viewing Completeness, and Patient-Reported Outcomes.
Observational study in Arthritis care & research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Communication Barriers in Patient-Provider Interactions in Health Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe assessed whether shared decision-making (SDM) and patient acceptability, feasibility, and overall satisfaction with a computerized patient decision aid (PtDA) for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) differs by PtDA setting, modality, and the viewing experience.
methodsPatients with SLE were invited to view a self-administered computerized SLE PtDA during regular clinic visits at 15 rheumatology clinics in an implementation trial. Patients completed a survey that included SDM measures including the decision conflict scale (DCS), Preparation for Decision Making (PDM) scale, and CollaboRATE scale, and we measured perceived patient acceptability, feasibility, and satisfaction. Patients viewed the SLE PtDA in two settings/places, in clinic or at home (telemedicine visits), using one of three modalities, a touchpad computer, smart phone, or computer (desktop or laptop computer). We also assessed the effects of interruptions while viewing the PtDA and incomplete viewings.
resultsWe had a cohort of 813 patients with SLE (43% of 1,895 total) who completed the PtDA modality and setting questions, which were added midway after the COVID-19 pandemic started. In a multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analysis, the setting or modality of viewing the SLE PtDA were not associated with SDM or patient outcomes except the association of place of viewing with feasibility. We noted important significant associations of interruption while viewing the SLE PtDA with lower feasibility, acceptability, and PDM and DCS scores and incomplete viewing of the SLE PtDA with worse PDM and DCS scores.
conclusionThe SLE PtDA was effective regardless of setting and modality of delivery. Uninterrupted and complete viewing of the SLE PtDA is desirable for better SDM and higher acceptability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.