Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40654118›Full record

SynthesisJournal of Indian Prosthodontic Society2025

A systematic review assessing the osseoincorporation potential of trabecular dental implants: A current evidence and future directions.

Karuna S Patwardhan, Nisha Puranik, Hema Kanathila, Santosh Yamanappa Nelogi, Vasanti P Jirge

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karuna S PatwardhanDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, KAHER'S KLE VK Institute of Dental Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Nisha PuranikDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, KAHER'S KLE VK Institute of Dental Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Hema KanathilaDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, KAHER'S KLE VK Institute of Dental Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Santosh Yamanappa NelogiDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, KAHER'S KLE VK Institute of Dental Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Vasanti P JirgeDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, KAHER'S KLE VK Institute of Dental Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

statement of problemThere is lack of evidence of studies conducted to compare the integration of soft and hard tissues of conventional implants and porous tantalum trabecular metal (PTTM dental implants). PURPOSE: This systematic review assessed the clinical outcomes evaluating the hard and soft-tissue parameters for PTTM dental implants when compared with conventional titanium dental implants. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review based on PRISMA 2020 checklist was used as guideline for reporting this protocol. The search was conducted in SCOPUS, PUBMED, Cochrane library, and EMBASE databases for the studies published from January 1, 2010, to January 1, 2023. The chosen publications' cross-references were further examined, and studies whose whole texts were not available through the computerized search were manually looked up.

resultsThrough search strategy a total of 1152 articles were yielded. After screening titles and abstracts, 9 articles were further screened for full text. After critical analysis, according to the eligibility criteria of this review, 7 articles were included in this systematic review for data extraction. Four studies revealed mean of 98.8% survival rate for trabecular implants. Histologically, 2 studies showed upregulation of bone morphogenic proteins, collagens, and growth factors with respect to trabecular dental implants.

conclusionFrom this study, it can be concluded that PTTM dental implants showed a better osseoincorporation potential than titanium implants. However, a longer follow-up period is required to assess its true potential.

Indexed as

Dental Implantation, EndosseousDental ImplantsOsseointegrationDental Prosthesis DesignHumansTantalumTitaniumDental ImplantsTantalumTitaniumImplant surfaceosseoincorporationtrabecular dental implants

Identifiers

PMID40654118
PMCPMC11853940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.