ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2025
What Is the Safest Population-Level Caesarean Delivery Rate? A National Cohort Study Using Natural Variation.
Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Delivery mode and maternal health conditions before and after childbirth: A population-based cohort study from Estonia.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTen to fifteen per cent has been proposed for many decades as the optimal level of caesarean section, with little supporting data. Norway provides a natural experiment in which local variations in the use of caesarean section can be related to health outcomes in the context of free access to high-quality medical services.
designProspective national cohort.
settingNorway. POPULATION: Norwegian deliveries 1995-2014.
methodsWe calculated annual rates of caesarean delivery and health outcomes for 435 municipalities. To avoid hospital referral bias, the mother's municipality of residence was the unit of analysis. Caesarean-delivery rates in each year were based on the 2 years before and after, avoiding indication bias. Analyses were adjusted for year, with additional adjustments in sensitivity analyses.
main outcome measuresMaternal mortality, severe maternal haemorrhage and perineal tears; stillbirth and neonatal death, neonatal encephalopathy and cerebral palsy.
resultsThere were 1 172 546 deliveries across 8647 municipality-year combinations over a 20-year period. Caesarean rates across municipalities ranged from about 10% to 20%, with quartile values of 13%, 16% (median) and 18%. Most adverse outcomes were least frequent in municipalities with caesarean rates above 15%. Lower rates of caesarean delivery were associated with more frequent occurrence of perineal tears (OR 1.41, 95% confidence interval 1.36-1.46), neonatal encephalopathy (OR 1.91, 1.71-2.13), cerebral palsy (1.48, 1.24-1.77) and stillbirths (OR 1.07, 0.99-1.17), but also with less frequent maternal haemorrhage (OR 0.81, 0.77-0.85). Further adjustments had minimal effect on estimates.
conclusionIn Norway, a country with free access to high-quality medical care, a local caesarean-delivery rate of 10% was associated with nearly a two-fold risk of neonatal encephalopathy and a 50% higher occurrence of cerebral palsy compared with areas with a caesarean-delivery rate of 20%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.