ArticlePain management2025
The Johns Hopkins multidisciplinary pediatric pain management service: a concept paper.
Article in Pain management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic pain in children poses a significant and under-addressed public health burden. This concept paper outlines the proposed design and implementation of a Multidisciplinary Pediatric Pain Management Service (MPPMS) at Johns Hopkins Medicine, addressing four key objectives. First, it presents a novel care delivery model grounded in the biopsychosocial framework, led by a multidisciplinary team and structured to deliver patient-centered care across escalating levels of clinical intensity. Second, it details the operationalization of the clinic in three phases, starting with a lean model and scaling toward a transdisciplinary team structure through enhanced clinic efficiency, technology integration, and strategic resource allocation. Third, it examines the financial implications of the model, including cost-per-encounter estimates, phased improvements in resource utilization, and strategies for achieving long-term sustainability through alternative revenue streams and workflow optimization. Fourth, it proposes a comprehensive outcomes framework encompassing clinical, operational, and financial metrics to guide continuous improvement and facilitate national benchmarking. Collectively, this paper provides a scalable blueprint for managing pediatric chronic pain that integrates care, optimizes operations, ensures fiscal responsibility, and delivers measurable patient benefit, positioning the MPPMS as a model that can be replicated at other institutions to address this growing clinical need.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.