Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40653715›Full record

ArticleBone & joint open2025

Outcomes of the hexapod frame in 111 'high risk' tibial fractures.

Jonathan France, Adam Tucker, Jessica Nightingale, Andrew Taylor, Simon Craxford, Benjamin Ollivere

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [Comparison between Taylor spatial frame and Ilizarov circular frame in treatment of large-segment tibial bone defect].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonathan FranceQueens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Adam TuckerBelfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Jessica NightingaleUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Andrew TaylorQueens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Simon CraxfordQueens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Benjamin OllivereSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: The use of circular frames in the management of tibia fractures and deformity correction is well established in the literature. The Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) is the most widely used hexapod device globally. However, the majority of published papers are small in patient numbers, contain primary and revision cases, and outcomes are therefore unclear. In this study we evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with tibial fractures treated primarily with a TSF. Methods: Patients were identified from a prospective trauma database at a UK major trauma centre. An analysis of patient records and radiographs was performed for the study. Patient demographics, comorbidities, frame construct, time in frame, union rates, and complications of treatment were analyzed. Results: Between September 2009 and January 2020, 111 patients with tibial fractures managed primarily with a TSF were included. The majority of patients (86, 77.5%) sustained fractures to the tibial shaft, leaving nine plateau (8.1%) and 16 pilon fractures (14.4%). Of these, 55 (49.6%) were open and 56 (50.4%) were closed. Of the open fractures, seven were classified as Gustilo and Anderson grade 3A and 41 (74.5%) were classified as grade 3B. The overall union rate for primary TSF was 85%, with a mean time to union of 191 days (SD 90). A total of 15 patients (13.5%) required either open reduction and internal fixation (n = 6, 5.4%) or intramedullary nail (n = 9, 8.2%) to achieve bony union. Five patients (4.5%) developed a deep infection requiring invasive treatment. Two patients (1.8%) required an eventual amputation for an infected nonunion; both of these patients sustained an initially closed fracture. Overall limb salvage at two years was 98.2%. Conclusion: The TSF remains an established option in the surgical management of patients with complex injuries to the tibia, with good rates of limb salvage within this challenging patient subgroup.

Identifiers

PMID40653715
PMCPMC12256801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.