Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40653501›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Multi objective moth swarm algorithm for optimizing electric vehicle integration in distribution grids.

Masoumeh Azadikhouy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Masoumeh AzadikhouyDepartment of Mathematics, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. masumeazadi.uni@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid integration of electric vehicles (EVs) into distribution grids introduces significant challenges, including heightened energy losses, voltage instability, and increased operational costs. Traditional optimization methods often address these issues in isolation, failing to balance the complex, multi-objective nature of modern grids with high EV penetration and renewable variability. This paper proposes a mixed-integer multi-objective optimization framework to simultaneously minimize operational costs, energy losses, load shedding, and voltage deviations over a 24-hour horizon. The model integrates EV charging/discharging dynamics, renewable energy management, demand-side flexibility, and coordinated control of grid devices such as On-Load Tap Changers (OLTC) and Static Voltage Regulators (SVR). A novel Multi-Objective Moth Swarm Algorithm (MOMSA) is introduced to efficiently navigate the non-convex solution space, leveraging moth-inspired exploration-exploitation mechanisms. Simulations on a 33-bus distribution network demonstrate MOMSA's superiority over conventional algorithms (e.g., HOA, PSO, GA), achieving a 19.2% cost reduction compared to non-EV-integrated scenarios and outperforming peers by 7.4-15.7% in total cost, energy loss reduction, and voltage stability. Sensitivity analyses under varying electricity prices, renewable intermittency, and uncoordinated EV charging validate the model's robustness, highlighting its adaptability to real-world uncertainties. The results underscore MOMSA's capability to enhance grid reliability, economic efficiency, and sustainability in EV-rich environments, addressing critical gaps in existing literature through comprehensive multi-objective coordination and scalable optimization.

Indexed as

Distribution grid optimizationElectric vehicle integrationMixed‐Integer programmingMulti-Objective moth swarm algorithmRenewable energy management

Identifiers

PMID40653501
PMCPMC12256598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.