ArticleAlgorithms for molecular biology : AMB2025
Swiftly identifying strongly unique k-mers.
Article in Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationShort DNA sequences of length k that appear in a single location (e.g., at a single genomic position, in a single species from a larger set of species, etc.) are called unique k-mers. They are useful for placing sequenced DNA fragments at the correct location without computing alignments and without ambiguity. However, they are not necessarily robust: A single basepair change may turn a unique k-mer into a different one that may in fact be present at one or more different locations, which may give confusing or contradictory information when attempting to place a read by its k-mer content. A more robust concept are strongly unique k-mers, i.e., unique k-mers for which no Hamming-distance-1 neighbor with conflicting information exists in all of the considered sequences. Given a set of k-mers, it is therefore of interest to have an efficient method that can distinguish k-mers with a Hamming-distance-1 neighbor in the collection from those that do not.
resultsWe present engineered algorithms to identify and mark within a set K of (canonical) k-mers all elements that have a Hamming-distance-1 neighbor in the same set. One algorithm is based on recursively running a 4-way comparison on sub-intervals of the sorted set. The other algorithm is based on bucketing and running a pairwise bit-parallel Hamming distance test on small buckets of the sorted set. Both methods consider canonical k-mers (i.e., taking reverse complements into account) and allow for efficient parallelization. The methods have been implemented and applied in practice to sets consisting of several billions of k-mers. An optimized combined approach running with 16 threads on a 16-core workstation yields wall times below 20 seconds on the 2.5 billion distinct 31-mers of the human telomere-to-telomere reference genome. AVAILABILITY: An implementation can be found at https://gitlab.com/rahmannlab/strong-k-mers .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.