Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40653383›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2025

Participatory Health Impact Assessment for Health and Well-Being Policy at Local Level in Thailand.

Nattaya Promthong, Suwicha Thaweesook, Phen Sukmak, Sirima Mongkolsomlit, Patchana Hengboriboonpong Jaidee, Weerasak Putthasri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Participatory Health Impact Assessment for Health and Well-Being Policy at Local Level in Thailand.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nattaya PromthongNational Health Commission Office, Nonthaburi, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8584-9028
Suwicha ThaweesookNational Health Commission Office, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Phen SukmakPublic Policy Institute, Prince of Songkhla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Sirima MongkolsomlitFaculty of Public Health, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Patchana Hengboriboonpong JaideeFaculty of Public Health, Burapha University, Chonburi, Thailand.
Weerasak PutthasriNational Health Commission Office, Nonthaburi, Thailand.

Funding

Health Systems Research Institute, Thailand HSRI 66-069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issue addressedAchieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) related to health and well-being requires diverse stakeholders' engagement. According to Thailand's constitution, the decentralisation of health promotion to Local Administrative Organizations (LAOs) has been increasingly implemented. The lessons learned from experiences in implementing well-being tools and engaging stakeholders in diverse local and cultural contexts offer practical benefits. This article describes the development of participatory policy using health impact assessment (HIA) in selected LAOs across Thailand, alongside bottom-up policy formulation, to support sustainable social well-being and community empowerment.

methodsA qualitative research approach was applied to examine HIA implementation in 12 purposively selected LAOs across Thailand. Data collection included document reviews, participatory observations of HIA meetings/activities and 156 in-depth interviews with key informants (KIs) who were actively involved in the HIA process. The analysis specifically examined the roles of community and stakeholder engagement, the implementation processes and the resulting outcomes.

resultsThe 12 LAOs selected a diverse range of challenges for HIA applications, including waste management, water pollution, elderly care, occupational health and community tourism. Community consultation with government personnel, academics and community members was conducted as the preparation phase to identify priority issues. Most participants emphasised that meaningful and inclusive participation through the HIA process was crucial for creating ownership and ensuring compliance with agreements. The influencing step of HIA was significant in securing commitment and continued support from local governments. Participants also mentioned increased motivation, active citizenship, community empowerment and collective leadership development.

conclusionsThe findings indicate that the HIA is a social tool effectively implemented in the community. Various issues and challenges of health and well-being are manifest in deployment. SO WHAT?: Inclusive participation through the policy development process at the local level is clarity to support sustainable social well-being and community empowerment.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationHealth Impact AssessmentHealth PolicyHealth PromotionCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchEmpowermentHumansInterviews as TopicLaosPolicy MakingQualitative ResearchStakeholder ParticipationSustainable DevelopmentThailand

Identifiers

PMID40653383
PMCPMC12256213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.