ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2025
A roadmap for T cell receptor-peptide-bound major histocompatibility complex binding prediction by machine learning: glimpse and foresight.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Re: Qi et al. "A roadmap for T cell receptor-peptide-MHC binding prediction by machine learning: glimpse and foresight" (Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2025).Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) play a key role in the defense of cancer and infectious diseases. CTLs are mainly activated by T cell receptors (TCRs) after recognizing the peptide-bound class I major histocompatibility complex, and subsequently kill virus-infected cells and tumor cells. Therefore, identification of antigen-specific CTLs and their TCRs is a promising agent for T-cell based intervention. Currently, the experimental identification and validation of antigen-specific CTLs is well-used but extremely resource-intensive. The machine learning methods for TCR-pMHC prediction are growing interest particularly with advances in single-cell technologies. This review clarifies the key biological processes involved in TCR-pMHC binding. After comprehensively comparing the advantages and disadvantages of several state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms for TCR-pMHC prediction, we point out the discrepancies with these machine learning methods under specific disease conditions. Finally, we proposed a roadmap of TCR-pMHC prediction. This roadmap would enable more accurate TCR-pMHC binding prediction when improving data quality, encoding and embedding methods, training models, and application context. This review could facilitate the development of T-cell based vaccines and therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.