Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40652710›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2025

Learning, prediction accuracy, and neural plasticity in sensory cortex.

Alison L Barth, Joseph A Christian, Ajit Ray

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alison L BarthDepartment of Biological Sciences and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. Electronic address: barth@cmu.edu.
Joseph A ChristianDepartment of Biological Sciences and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Ajit RayDepartment of Biological Sciences and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

Funding

Determinants of sparse activity in neocortexR01NS123711 · NINDS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI ALISON L BARTH · 2022 to 2026
$2.5M
High Throughput Approaches for Cell-Specific Synapse CharacterizationRF1MH114103 · NIMH · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI BARTH, ALISON L, BRUCHEZ, MARCEL P · 2017 to 2018
$2.5M
Fluorescence-based methods for microconnectivity analysis in neocortexRF1MH129267 · NIMH · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI BARTH, ALISON L · 2022 to 2022
$1.6M
Synaptic plasticity in sensory learningR21NS127354 · NINDS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI BARTH, ALISON L · 2022 to 2022
$397k
NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH114103NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH129267NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS123711NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS127354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Causal inference during association learning is a cardinal feature of complex nervous systems. In reinforcement learning, a stimulus or context becomes linked to a negative or positive outcome to inform future behavior. Although prefrontal cortex and striatal circuits have been implicated in reinforcement learning, sensory cortex also undergoes marked short-term and long-lasting changes. Here we review studies demonstrating anatomical, synaptic, and task-dependent response plasticity in sensory cortex during learning. A contrast between plasticity induced by sensory association learning, where stimuli predict reinforcement outcomes, and pseudotraining, where sensory inputs are uncoupled, is consistent with sensory cortex's role in prediction evaluation and reinforcement signaling. We propose that plasticity in sensory cortex-a site for collision of internally-generated expectations and incoming sensory input-reflects the relative accuracy of expected versus actual sensory signals as they develop during learning. Sensory learning may thus be a useful tool to probe the function of neocortical circuits.

Indexed as

Association LearningLearningNeuronal PlasticitySensorimotor CortexAnimalsHumansReinforcement, Psychology

Identifiers

PMID40652710
PMCPMC12682262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.