Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40652515›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

Harnessing Machine Learning to Enhance Transition State Search with Interatomic Potentials and Generative Models.

Qiyuan Zhao, Yunhong Han, Duo Zhang, Jiaxu Wang, Peichen Zhong, Taoyong Cui, Bangchen Yin, Yirui Cao, Haojun Jia, Chenru Duan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Adaptive Transition-State Refinement with Learned Equilibrium Flows.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Qiyuan ZhaoDeep Principle Inc., Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3228-8160
Yunhong HanDeep Principle Inc., Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Duo ZhangAI for Science Institute, Beijing, 100080, P. R. China.
Jiaxu WangDeep Principle Inc., Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Peichen ZhongBakar Institute of Digital Materials for the Planet, UC Berkeley, California, 94720, United States.
Taoyong CuiDeep Principle Inc., Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Bangchen YinDepartment of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Yirui CaoDeep Principle Inc., Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Haojun JiaDeep Principle Inc., Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Chenru DuanDeep Principle Inc., Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2592-4237

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transition state (TS) search is crucial for illuminating chemical reaction mechanisms but remains the major bottleneck in automated discovery because of the high computational cost. Recently, machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) and generative models have shown promise in accelerating TS search, but their comparative strengths and limitations remain unclear. In this study, the first systematic and rigorous benchmarking framework is established to evaluate the effectiveness of ML methods in TS search, enabling a standardized and application-relevant assessment of their performance. Using an end-to-end TS search workflow, seven representative MLIPs are benchmarked alongside React-OT, a state-of-the-art generative model. These results demonstrate that pre-trained foundation MLIPs frequently fall short in reliably localizing TSs without task-specific fine-tuning. Furthermore, traditional energy and force metrics alone do not reliably predict TS search success, underscoring the need for more tailored evaluation criteria. Notably, with the same graph neural network architecture, React-OT frequently outperforms its MLIP counterpart, highlighting the potential of generative approaches for TS discovery. This benchmark serves as a critical foundation for the development and evaluation of future ML methods in chemical reactions, offering guidance for improving their generalizability and reliability in reactive chemistry.

Indexed as

automated reaction predictiondiffusion modelmachine learning interatomic potentialreaction networkstransition states

Identifiers

PMID40652515
PMCPMC12442704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.