Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40652445›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2025

Revisiting Acyclovir Dosing for Adult Viral Encephalitis Using a Full Bayesian LeiCNS PBPK Modeling Approach.

Ming Sun, Martijn L Manson, Anne-Grete Märtson, Jacob Bodilsen, Elizabeth C M de Lange, Tingjie Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ming SunSystems Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Martijn L MansonSystems Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Anne-Grete MärtsonSystems Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jacob BodilsenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Elizabeth C M de LangeSystems Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Tingjie GuoSystems Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. t.guo@lacdr.leidenuniv.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-7892-6220

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveAcyclovir is a primary treatment for central nervous system (CNS) infections caused by herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV). However, patient outcomes remain suboptimal, despite acyclovir treatment. Given the lack of alternative therapies, there is a pressing clinical need to revisit acyclovir dosing for viral encephalitis. This study aimed to evaluate current and alternative acyclovir dosing regimens using a Bayesian CNS physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach.

methodA full Bayesian analysis was performed using LeiCNS3.0 model to describe acyclovir's CNS distribution. Simulations were performed for standard dosing (10 mg/kg TID) and various alternative dosing regimens. Drug efficacy was evaluated using 50%fT > IC

resultsThe standard regimen (10 mg/kg TID) achieved the 50%fT > IC

Indexed as

AcyclovirAntiviral AgentsEncephalitis, ViralModels, BiologicalAdultBayes TheoremComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugHerpesvirus 3, HumanHumansMaleMiddle AgedAcyclovirAntiviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID40652445
PMCPMC12414069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.