Trial reportJournal of robotic surgery2025
Artificial intelligence-based action recognition and skill assessment in robotic cardiac surgery simulation: a feasibility study.
Trial report in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05043064 (Validity Evidence for Simulation-based Assessment of Robotic Cardiac Surgical Skills and Examination of Learning Curves in Wet Labs), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Validity Evidence for Simulation-based Assessment of Robotic Cardiac Surgical Skills and Examination of Learning Curves in Wet Labs
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A single-port robotic platform for minimally invasive cardiac surgery: system functionality and initial preclinical feasibility.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning for automated robotic surgical skill assessment using rich kinematic features.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Deep Learning and Cardiovascular Diseases: An Updated Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A function-based framework for AI-amplified, data-driven healthcare simulation research.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2026Article
- Review
- Closing the data gap: leveraging pretrained neural networks for robotic surgical assessment on limited clinical data.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To create a deep neural network capable of recognizing basic surgical actions and categorizing surgeons based on their skills using video data only. Nineteen surgeons with varying levels of robotic experience performed three wet lab tasks on a porcine model: robotic-assisted atrial closure, mitral stitches, and dissection of the thoracic artery. We used temporal labeling to mark two surgical actions: suturing and dissection. Each complete recording was annotated as either "novice" or "expert" based on the operator's experience. The network architecture combined a Convolutional Neural Network for extracting spatial features with a Long Short-Term Memory layer to incorporate temporal information. A total of 435 recordings were analyzed. The fivefold cross-validation yielded a mean accuracy of 98% for the action recognition (AR) and 79% for the skill assessment (SA) network. The AR model achieved an accuracy of 93%, with average recall, precision, and F1-score all at 93%. The SA network had an accuracy of 56% and a predictive certainty of 95%. Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping revealed that the algorithm focused on the needle, suture, and instrument tips during suturing, and on the tissue during dissection. AR network demonstrated high accuracy and predictive certainty, even with a limited dataset. The SA network requires more data to become a valuable tool for performance evaluation. When combined, these deep learning models can serve as a foundation for AI-based automated post-procedural assessments in robotic cardiac surgery simulation. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05043064).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.