Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40652436›Full record

Trial reportJournal of robotic surgery2025

Artificial intelligence-based action recognition and skill assessment in robotic cardiac surgery simulation: a feasibility study.

Gennady V Atroshchenko, Lærke Riis Korup, Nasseh Hashemi, Lasse Riis Østergaard, Martin G Tolsgaard, Sten Rasmussen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05043064 (Validity Evidence for Simulation-based Assessment of Robotic Cardiac Surgical Skills and Examination of Learning Curves in Wet Labs), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05043064 nacompletednot on this map

Validity Evidence for Simulation-based Assessment of Robotic Cardiac Surgical Skills and Examination of Learning Curves in Wet Labs

TypeinterventionalSponsorAalborg University HospitalRan2021 to 2022Enrolled19ConditionsRobotic Cardiac Surgery SimulationArmsWet lab tasks
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gennady V AtroshchenkoDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark. gennady.atroshchenko@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5326-2167
Lærke Riis KorupDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.
Nasseh HashemiDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Lasse Riis ØstergaardDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Martin G TolsgaardCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Center for HR & Education, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sten RasmussenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To create a deep neural network capable of recognizing basic surgical actions and categorizing surgeons based on their skills using video data only. Nineteen surgeons with varying levels of robotic experience performed three wet lab tasks on a porcine model: robotic-assisted atrial closure, mitral stitches, and dissection of the thoracic artery. We used temporal labeling to mark two surgical actions: suturing and dissection. Each complete recording was annotated as either "novice" or "expert" based on the operator's experience. The network architecture combined a Convolutional Neural Network for extracting spatial features with a Long Short-Term Memory layer to incorporate temporal information. A total of 435 recordings were analyzed. The fivefold cross-validation yielded a mean accuracy of 98% for the action recognition (AR) and 79% for the skill assessment (SA) network. The AR model achieved an accuracy of 93%, with average recall, precision, and F1-score all at 93%. The SA network had an accuracy of 56% and a predictive certainty of 95%. Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping revealed that the algorithm focused on the needle, suture, and instrument tips during suturing, and on the tissue during dissection. AR network demonstrated high accuracy and predictive certainty, even with a limited dataset. The SA network requires more data to become a valuable tool for performance evaluation. When combined, these deep learning models can serve as a foundation for AI-based automated post-procedural assessments in robotic cardiac surgery simulation. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05043064).

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCardiac Surgical ProceduresClinical CompetenceRobotic Surgical ProceduresAnimalsFeasibility StudiesHumansNeural Networks, ComputerSwineAutomated skill assessmentConvolutional neural networkDeep learningRobotic cardiac surgerySurgical action recognition

Identifiers

PMID40652436
PMCPMC12256361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.