ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2025
CoBdock-2: enhancing blind docking performance through hybrid feature selection combining ensemble and multimodel feature selection approaches.
Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- CB-Dock3: an enhanced web server for protein-ligand blind docking.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Prodrug-ML: prodrug-likeness prediction via machine learning on sampled negative decoys.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- μOR-ligand: target-aware view-based hybrid feature selection for μ-opioid receptor ligand functional classification.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying orthosteric binding sites and predicting small molecule affinities remains a key challenge in virtual screening. While blind docking explores the entire protein surface, its precision is hindered by the vast search space. Cavity detection-guided docking improves accuracy by narrowing focus to predicted pockets, but its effectiveness depends heavily on the quality of cavity detection tools. To overcome these limitations, we developed Consensus Blind Dock (CoBDock), a machine learning-based blind docking method that integrates molecular docking and cavity detection results to enhance binding site and pose prediction. Building on this, CoBDock-2 replaces traditional docking tools by extracting 1D numerical representations from protein, ligand, and interaction structural features, and applying advanced ensemble feature selection techniques. By evaluating 21 feature selection methods across 9,598 features, CoBDock-2 identifies key molecular characteristics of orthosteric binding sites. CoBDock-2 demonstrates consistent improvements over the original CoBDock across benchmark datasets (PDBBind v2020-general, MTi, ADS, DUD-E, CASF-2016), achieving 77% binding site identification accuracy (within 8 Å), 55% ligand pose prediction accuracy (RMSD
Indexed as
Identifiers
40652425What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.