ArticlePediatric surgery international2025
Laparoscopic management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in duplex kidneys: comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty and laparoscopic pyeloureterostomy.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pyeloplasty outcomes in children with complex anatomy: an observational series of reconstruction in concurrent ureterovesical obstruction, duplex, malrotated or ectopic moieties and horseshoe kidneys.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Observational
- Large Ureterocele Associated With a Duplex Collecting System in an Infant: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Robot-Assisted Anderson-Hynes Pyeloplasty for Lower-Moiety Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in an Incomplete Duplex Collecting System Presenting as Dietl's Crisis: A Case Report.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Surgical management of incomplete duplex kidney with calculus and homolateral ureterovesical junction obstruction: a case report and literature review.AME case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeUreteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in duplex systems is rare, with laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) and laparoscopic pyelo-ureterostomy (LPU) being the main surgical options. However, guidelines for selecting the appropriate procedure based on anatomical variations are lacking. This study evaluates the outcomes of laparoscopic management of duplex UPJO in children, comparing LP and LPU.
methodsA retrospective review was conducted on children who underwent surgery for UPJO in duplex systems at two pediatric urology centers over 10 years. Preoperative imaging included ultrasound, diuretic renogram, voiding cystourethrography, and magnetic resonance urography when needed. Retrograde pyelography confirmed anatomy. LP was preferred for lower moiety (LM) UPJO, while LPU was performed for short-segment or hypoplastic incomplete duplex. All children had double J stents for 4-6 weeks. Statistical analysis used t tests and Chi-square tests.
resultsAmong 25 children (complete: 11, incomplete: 14), LP was performed in 9/11 complete and 3/14 incomplete cases (p = 0.01). LPU was performed in 11 incomplete cases. The mean operative time was 113 min for LP and 137 min for LPU (p = 0.01). The median hospital stay was 2 days. Two children had postoperative UTIs, and one had early stent expulsion. Outcomes were favorable in all cases.
conclusionDuplex UPJO consisted of only 3.2% of a large cohort of UPJO from two busy pediatric urology centers. LP was possible in most UPJO in complete duplex, while most UPJO in incomplete duplex had to be managed with LPU. Although LPU was more challenging with longer operative time than LP, both LP and LPU had comparably good results. We strongly recommend intraoperative RGP in all cases of suspected duplex to decide the best surgical option in each case.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40652413What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.