ArticlePhysical therapy2025
Development and Validation of PT-PENCIL: The Physical Therapy Frequency Clinical Decision Support Tool to Increase Hospital Discharge to Home.
Article in Physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceIdentifying patients most likely to benefit from physical therapy in the hospital could aid physical therapists in optimizing treatment allocation for the purpose of increasing discharge to home.
objectiveThe aims of this study were to develop and externally validate a predictive model for discharge to home on the basis of physical therapy frequency for patients who were hospitalized.
designA predictive model was developed using retrospective cohort data collected between April 2017 and August 2022, with external validation conducted in a separate sample.
settingThe setting was a large health system.
participantsParticipants were adult patients who were hospitalized and received physical therapy. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Predictors were extracted from the electronic health record and included demographics, clinical characteristics, and therapist-entered variables such as home set-up and prehospital level of function. Physical therapy frequency was quantified as once daily, defined as ≥5 times per week. The outcome was discharge to home. Variables were included in the final multivariable logistic regression model on the basis of associations with physical therapy frequency and/or outcome and clinical relevance. Calibration and discrimination of the models were assessed.
resultsThe development sample included 205,659 adult patient (average age = 72.2 [SD = 14.3] years; 55.3% female) hospitalizations, with 52.5% of patients receiving physical therapy daily and an overall proportion of 67.1% being discharged to home. The final multivariable model included 8 variables, with good calibration and discrimination. Internal validity was established with an optimism-corrected concordance statistic of 0.874 (95% CI = 0.872-0.875). The external sample included 102,311 patient (average age = 67.7 [SD = 16.5] years; 50.9% female) admissions, with 64.5% of patients receiving physical therapy daily and 77.8% being discharged to home. Predictive performance was high (calibration slope = 0.908), and discrimination was good (concordance statistic = 0.851). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study developed and externally validated the underlying prediction model for a clinical decision support tool, termed Physical Therapy Frequency Clinical Decision Support Tool (PT-PENCIL), to identify patients most likely to benefit from daily physical therapy to discharge to home. Future work will evaluate the implementation of PT-PENCIL to determine its effect on patient-centered outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.