ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Impact of early vs. delayed physical therapy on functional recovery, proprioception, and return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of Functional Outcomes of Accelerated versus Conventional Rehabilitation after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Rehabilitation-oriented assessment of functional asymmetry and sensorimotor deficits following total knee arthroplasty: implications for therapeutic strategies in musculoskeletal care.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly physical therapy (PT) following ACL reconstruction is widely advocated for optimizing post-operative recovery. However, its impact on functional recovery, proprioception, return-to-sport (RTS) rates, and graft integrity remains debated. This study aims to evaluate whether early PT initiation enhances functional and proprioceptive outcomes without compromising knee stability.
objectivesTo compare the effects of early (≤ 2 weeks) vs. delayed (≥ 4 weeks) PT initiation on functional recovery, proprioception, RTS success, and graft integrity following ACL reconstruction.
methodsA cross-sectional study included 132 participants (n = 66 per group) who were evaluated using standardized assessments, including IKDC scores, quadriceps strength (hand-held dynamometer), knee range of motion (digital inclinometer), proprioception (joint position sense error, Y-Balance Test, and postural stability via force platform), RTS success, and graft integrity (Lachman and Pivot-Shift tests). All outcome measures were assessed between 6 and 12 months post-operatively during routine clinical follow-up, providing a standardized timeframe for evaluating recovery and RTS readiness.
resultsThe early PT group demonstrated significantly higher IKDC scores (85.60 ± 6.80 vs. 80.40 ± 7.30, p < 0.001), greater quadriceps strength (2.30 ± 0.40 vs. 2.00 ± 0.50 Nm/kg, p = 0.001), and improved knee ROM (135.20 ± 4.80° vs. 130.80 ± 5.20°, p < 0.001). The proprioceptive function was superior in early PT, with lower JPS error (p < 0.001), higher Y-Balance scores (p = 0.001), and greater postural stability (p < 0.001). RTS rates were higher in the early PT group (78.79% vs. 65.15%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.121). No significant differences were observed in graft integrity (p = 0.715) or knee stability tests (p > 0.05).
conclusionEarly PT initiation significantly enhances functional recovery and proprioception without increasing the risk of graft failure or knee instability. These findings support the safety and efficacy of early rehabilitation in optimizing post-operative ACL recovery and RTS readiness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.