ArticleBMC palliative care2025
Factors that support home deaths for patients receiving at-home palliative and end-of-life care: a sequential mixed-methods explanatory study.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Readiness for home-based palliative care among primary caregivers: an explanatory sequential mixed methods study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Practices and perspectives on dying at home in Norwegian home care services - a secondary analysis of qualitative data.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Effective practices and transdisciplinary team-based approaches in home palliative care for terminal cancer patients: a qualitative descriptive study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Care competency scale for family caregivers in home palliative care: Turkish adaptation, validity, and reliability study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Nursing interventions for patients in last days of life and their family caregivers at home: a protocol for a mixed methods systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- End-of-life care for older adults receiving home medical care in Japan: a pilot retrospective cohort study.Journal of rural medicine : JRM · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSignificant knowledge gaps persist in understanding how to support patients receiving palliative and end-of-life care (PEoLC) who wish to die at home. This study aimed to identify factors associated with remaining at home and home death for patients receiving PEoLC.
methodsA sequential mixed-methods explanatory study (QUANT + QUAL) was conducted. Administrative data from a not-for-profit at-home palliative care organization in Québec Canada from 2015 to 2024 (n = 5931) and 73 semi-structured interviews with patients receiving PEoLC, caregivers, service providers and decision-makers were collected. Logistic and Cox regression models were completed for the quantitative data analysis. Content analysis was used for the qualitative data analysis. Data integration occurred following the quantitative analyses.
resultsThe mean age of patients requiring PEoLC was 77.97 (SD: 13.70) years. The sample included 50.3% men and 49.7% women. One quarter (25.8%) of patients receiving PEoLC lived alone. Most patients (93.5%) had cancer. Home death occurred in almost 30% of cases. Over 95% of deaths occurred within 365 days following admission to the at-home palliative care organization. Access to respite care (adjusted odds ratio: 2.699, p < 0.001), female sex, living alone, having been hospitalized, receiving psychological care, and volunteer and transportation support were associated with remaining at home and home deaths for patients receiving PEoLC. The interviews highlighted the importance of respecting the patients' wishes related to end of life and home death. All participants described several challenges to access timely and reliable services following the pandemic. Timely access to home care, nursing and hygiene and a palliative care approach facilitated remaining at home and home death for patients receiving PEoLC.
conclusionsRespite care more than doubles the odds of remaining at home and home death. Timely access to services that include home care, nursing care and hygiene and a palliative care approach is essential to support patients receiving PEoLC who wish to die at home. Stabilizing staffing of home care teams, standardizing PEoLC services offered across community health centers in the province, and optimal use of nurse practitioners would improve services offered to patients receiving PEoLC and their caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.