ArticleBMC palliative care2025
Improving the oncology care pathway through the experience of patients and their caregiver.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping methods and tools for measuring patient experience in oncology settings: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Access to innovation in oncology from patients' perspectives: a qualitative systematic review.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Mapping the Patient Journey of Oral Microbiota Transplantation During Radiotherapy: A Qualitative Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Culture sensitive care in oncology care settings in Jordan: a qualitative study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to explore the lived experiences of individuals undergoing cancer treatment and their family caregivers to identify gaps and potential improvements in the oncology care pathway. It seeks to address the challenges faced during diagnosis, treatment, remission, and the transition to palliative care, emphasizing the need for patient-centered care.
methodsA qualitative exploratory study was conducted through focus groups with cancer patients (PCs) and family caregivers (FCs). Participants were recruited using a snowball method via oncology networks and patient associations. Six focus groups were held, with participants sharing their experiences across the care continuum. Data were collected using an open-ended interview guide, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically to identify recurring themes and insights.
resultsA total of 34 participants (25 PCs and 9 FCs) highlighted key challenges, including a lack of care coordination, insufficient communication, and limited access to supportive oncology services. Many PCs felt overwhelmed by administrative burdens, delays in testing, and inadequate follow-up care. FCs often reported feeling excluded from critical consultations and unsupported in caregiving responsibilities. Positive experiences were associated with coordinated care and access to supportive services, though these were inconsistently provided.
conclusionThe study underscores significant gaps in oncology care, particularly in care coordination, emotional support, and communication. Incorporating the voices of PCs and FCs into healthcare policies can foster a more empathetic, coordinated, and patient-centered oncology care system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.