ArticleBMC public health2025
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Chinese college students towards novel psychoactive substances.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) among Chinese college students regarding novel psychoactive substances (NPS), where practices specifically refer to behaviors related to NPS access and usage patterns.
methodsAn online questionnaire was used to collect demographic information and KAP scores from college students. A total of 1,543 participants were recruited using a combination of targeted and convenience sampling. We used a self-designed questionnaire assessing knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to the harmfulness and addictiveness of NPS. The tool demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.915). Data were analyzed using SPSS with non-parametric tests, Spearman correlations, and multivariable logistic regression.
resultsA total of 1,543 college students were enrolled, of whom 1,465 (94.9%) had received anti-drug education. The median knowledge score was 25 out of 32, and 65.4% correctly identified NPS as drug analogues with strong psychoactive effects. The median attitude score was 46 out of 50, with over 55% of students expressing strong disagreement with NPS use. In terms of practice, over 85% reported never accessing NPS through recreational venues, the Internet, or social contacts. Students older than 18 years were significantly less likely to engage in NPS-related behaviors (OR = 0.2; 95% CI: 0.12-0.34; p < 0.001). Those holding a bachelor's degree or higher also showed lower likelihood of such behaviors (OR = 0.1; 95% CI: 0.10-0.23; p < 0.001). In contrast, students with more positive attitudes towards NPS prevention (attitude score ≥ 46) were more likely to adopt preventive practices (OR = 1.9; 95% CI: 1.28-2.69; p = 0.001). Additionally, an attitude score of ≥ 46 increased the likelihood of safer practices [OR = 1.9; 95% CI: 1.28-2.69; p = 0.001]. Knowledge was positively correlated with attitudes (r = 0.20; p < 0.001), and attitudes were positively correlated with practices (r = 0.29; p < 0.001), supporting the internal consistency of the KAP model. However, the correlation between knowledge and practices was weak and negative (r =-0.05; p = 0.033), suggesting that knowledge alone may not be sufficient to promote preventive behaviors.
conclusionsThe study shows that college students have good knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding NPS, but highlights a need for more practical anti-drug education to improve the application of this knowledge. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.