ArticleBMC public health2025
Long-term exposure to PM
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEnvironmental pollution not only poses a direct threat to human health but also exacerbates economic inequality through various channels. The China Clean Air Action (CCAA) has been shown to alleviate the health burden caused by air pollution. Although the link between environmental degradation and poverty have been increasingly recognized, there are few studies that systematically assess the impact of the CCAA on reducing multidimensional poverty and the role of respiratory diseases (RD) in this context.
methodsWe utilized data from three waves of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study and estimated annual average particulate matter (PM
resultsAfter adjusting for confounders, from 2011 to 2015, the intervention group exhibited a significantly greater reduction in multidimensional poverty index (MPI) compared to the control group, with an average difference of -0.0206 points (95% confidence interval: -0.0318 to -0.0092). As long-term PM
conclusionThis study demonstrates that long-term PM
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.