ArticleBMC neurology2025
Construction and verification of a risk prediction model for patients with kinesophobia after cerebral hemorrhage surgery.
Article in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting kinesiophobia in knee osteoarthritis: a head-to-head comparison between machine learning and traditional regression models.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Kinesiophobia in stroke patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study based on latent profile analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo establish a risk prediction model of kinesophobia in patients after cerebral hemorrhage surgery and verify its effect.
methodsA total of 218 patients after cerebral hemorrhage surgery were selected, and the differences in clinical data between kinesophobia patients and non-kinesophobia patients were analyzed. Using 20 indexes as independent variables, the characteristic variables were screened by LASSO regression, and then multivariate Logistic regression analysis was carried out. Based on the results, the nomogram prediction model was constructed, and the model was verified from the aspects of clinical applicability, discrimination, and calibration.
resultsSignificant differences were found in age, electronic health literacy score, depression score, NIHSS score, VAS pain score, intraoperative blood loss, and anxiety score between patients with phobia and non-phobia (P < 0.05). 12 characteristic variables were selected by LASSO regression. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that age, NIHSS score, VAS pain score and depression score were independent risk factors for the occurrence of kinesophobia after cerebral hemorrhage surgery (OR > 1 and P < 0.05), and electronic health literacy score was an independent protective factor (OR < 1 and P < 0.05). Based on age, NIHSS score, VAS pain score, e-health literacy score, and depression score, a nomogram prediction model was constructed. The DCA curve shows that the model has the highest clinical net benefit when the threshold probability is between 0.14 and 0.99, indicating good clinical applicability. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) is 0.836(95% CI: 0.782-0.890), which indicates good discrimination. Spiegelhalter's z test and the calibration curve show that the calibration degree is good, and the C statistic after Bootstrap self-sampling internal verification is 0.820 (95% CI: 0.772-0.877), indicating that the prediction is robust.
conclusionThe nomogram prediction model of the risk of kinesophobia after cerebral hemorrhage based on multivariate regression analysis has a good prediction effect, which can provide reference for the clinical prevention of kinesophobia after cerebral hemorrhage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.