ArticleScientific reports2025
Early breast cancer detection via infrared thermography using a CNN enhanced with particle swarm optimization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic Thermography-Based Early Breast Cancer Detection Using Multivariate Time Series.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cancer and Aging Biomarkers: Classification, Early Detection Technologies and Emerging Research Trends.Biosensors · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer remains the most prevalent cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide, with an estimated incidence exceeding 500,000 new cases annually. Timely diagnosis is vital for enhancing therapeutic outcomes and increasing survival probabilities. Although conventional diagnostic tools such as mammography are widely used and generally effective, they are often invasive, costly, and exhibit reduced efficacy in patients with dense breast tissue. Infrared thermography, by contrast, offers a non-invasive and economical alternative; however, its clinical adoption has been limited, largely due to difficulties in accurate thermal image interpretation and the suboptimal tuning of machine learning algorithms. To overcome these limitations, this study proposes an automated classification framework that employs convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for distinguishing between malignant and benign thermographic breast images. An Enhanced Particle Swarm Optimization (EPSO) algorithm is integrated to automatically fine-tune CNN hyperparameters, thereby minimizing manual effort and enhancing computational efficiency. The methodology also incorporates advanced image preprocessing techniques-including Mamdani fuzzy logic-based edge detection, Contrast-Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE) for contrast enhancement, and median filtering for noise suppression-to bolster classification performance. The proposed model achieves a superior classification accuracy of 98.8%, significantly outperforming conventional CNN implementations in terms of both computational speed and predictive accuracy. These findings suggest that the developed system holds substantial potential for early, reliable, and cost-effective breast cancer screening in real-world clinical environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.