Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40652117›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2025

Whole-body immobilization modulates visuotactile interaction.

Naoki Kuroda, Ryo Teraoka, Shinya Harada, Wataru Teramoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Naoki KurodaResearch Organization of Open Innovation and Collaboration, Ritsumeikan University, 2-150 Iwakura-cho, Ibaraki, Osaka, 567-8570, Japan. n.kuroda25@gmail.com.
Ryo TeraokaGraduate School of Engineering, Muroran Institute of Technology, 27-1 Mizumoto-cho, Muroran, Hokkaido, 050-8585, Japan.
Shinya HaradaFaculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (Psychology), Kumamoto University, 2-40-1 Kurokami, Kumamoto, 860-8555, Japan.
Wataru TeramotoFaculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (Psychology), Kumamoto University, 2-40-1 Kurokami, Kumamoto, 860-8555, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripersonal space (PPS) is the space immediately around each body part. A previous study reported that hand-centered PPS shrank after hand immobilization; however, little is known about what happens in the PPS of other body parts. Here, we investigated the effect of whole-body immobilization on trunk-centered PPS by fixing the whole-body in a large box. Two experiments were conducted. Experiment 1 compared trunk-centered PPS with and without a large box. Experiment 2 manipulated the box size (large or small) to investigate the effects of box embodiment. Participants were tasked with responding as quickly as possible to a tactile stimulus on their chest while viewing a visual probe approaching from various distances. A visual facilitation effect in PPS was defined as the amount that the visual probe facilitated tactile detection in each distance condition. In addition, participants evaluated body immobilization under all conditions. The results showed that the visual facilitation effect on tactile detection was significantly greater in the with-box than in the without-box conditions in Experiment 1, and was significantly greater in the small box than in the large box conditions in Experiment 2. However, neither experiment clearly estimated PPS boundaries, although the visual probe located at farther distances had significantly less visual facilitation effect. Perceived body immobilization was stronger in the with-box than without-box conditions in Experiment 1 and was stronger in the small box than in the large box conditions in Experiment 2. These results suggest that body immobilization, rather than box embodiments, can induce stronger visuotactile interaction.

Indexed as

ImmobilizationPersonal SpaceSpace PerceptionTouch PerceptionVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultBody immobilizationPeripersonal spaceVirtual realityVisuotactile interaction

Identifiers

PMID40652117
PMCPMC12255558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.