ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2025
AI-driven robotic surgery in oncology: advancing precision, personalization, and patient outcomes.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of artificial intelligence in lung cancer diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis.BMC medical genomics · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and robotic surgery in emergency gastrointestinal procedures: a review of current evidence and future directions.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- When Intuition Meets the Algorithm: Medico-Legal Implications of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Decision-Making in Orthopedics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- AI-enhanced robotic hands: a breakthrough in early tumour detection and removal.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Intelligent therapeutic robotic-assisted surgery as the next frontier of precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Molecular Basis, Diagnostic Approaches, and Therapeutic Strategies in Colorectal Cancer-Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- Real-time laboratory integration in robotic surgery: bridging biochemical intelligence with surgical precision.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) integrated with robotic systems is transforming oncologic surgery by significantly improving precision, safety, and personalization. The review critically explores the current landscape of AI-powered robotic technologies in tumor resection across various specialties, including urology, neurosurgery, orthopedics, pediatrics, and head and neck oncology. Despite rapid advancements, challenges remain in tumor boundary detection, real-time intraoperative navigation, motion compensation, and seamless data integration. Drawing on evidence from 22 recent clinical studies, pilot trials, and simulation-based research, the review identifies key innovations such as image-free robotic palpation, sensor-assisted feedback, 3D anatomical modeling, and adaptive motion management in radiotherapy. These technologies contribute to enhanced surgical accuracy, reduced invasiveness, and improved intraoperative decision-making. However, barriers such as inconsistent clinical protocols, limited cost-effectiveness data, and variability in performance across tumor types continue to hinder widespread adoption. Challenges persist in complex fields such as pediatric and neurosurgical oncology, where anatomical variability and safety concerns demand more advanced solutions. The review emphasizes the need for interoperable AI-robotic platforms, robust real-time analytics, and standardized safety frameworks. It also highlights the importance of ethical governance and clinician training in ensuring responsible implementation. In conclusion, AI-powered robotic surgery represents a major shift in oncology, offering the potential to improve long-term outcomes and reduce recurrence through data-driven, minimally invasive interventions. Realizing the potential will require interdisciplinary collaboration, longitudinal clinical validation, and strategic integration into healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.