ArticleAmerican journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions2025
Cost-Effectiveness of Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure Irrespective of Left-Ventricle Ejection Fraction in the Netherlands.
Article in American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveClinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) empagliflozin in patients suffering from heart failure (HF), regardless of whether their left-ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) is reduced (HFrEF), mildly reduced (HFmrEF), or preserved (HFpEF). This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin when added to standard of care (SoC), consisting of lifestyle changes, medications, and surgery or devices, compared to SoC alone in patients with chronic HF irrespective of LVEF in the Netherlands.
methodsA Markov model was developed to simulate patient outcomes over a lifetime horizon, incorporating data from the EMPEROR-Reduced and EMPEROR-Preserved trials. Key outcomes included incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) expressed in costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, life expectancy, and hospitalization rates. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results.
resultsThe analysis revealed that treatment with empagliflozin plus SoC resulted in higher life expectancy (6.58 vs. 6.47 years for HFrEF; 7.78 vs. 7.69 years for HFmrEF/HFpEF) and a lower incidence of HF hospitalizations compared to SoC alone. The ICERs were €8515/QALY for HFrEF and €9807/QALY for HFmrEF/HFpEF, both below the willingness-to-pay threshold of €50,000/QALY, indicating cost-effectiveness. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results, indicating there is a high probability (97% for HFrEF and 98% for HFmrEF/HFpEF) that empagliflozin plus SoC is cost-effective.
conclusionEmpagliflozin, when added to SoC, is a cost-effective treatment option for patients irrespective of LVEF in the Netherlands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.