ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting the compressive strength of concrete incorporating waste powders exposed to elevated temperatures utilizing machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimization of mechanical performance in bioinspired FDM-printed PLA sandwich structures using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AI-driven quality classification of concrete after high-temperature exposure: a hybrid framework for structural integrity assessment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Predicting compressive strength of mortars containing recycled CRT glass using GMDH and GEP methods.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Performance Analysis of Boosting-Based Machine Learning Models for Predicting the Compressive Strength of Biochar-Cementitious Composites.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of machine learning models with SHAP interpretation for causes of highway flood-damage blocking.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Machine learning driven optimization of biomedical waste ash concrete for sustainable construction.PloS one · 2026Article
- Experimental and RSM simulation assessment of Gamma-ray shielding efficiency of nano-modified concrete exposed to elevated temperatures.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prediction and parametric modeling of compressive strength of waste marble dust concrete through machine learning and experimental analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- CFG-DWC: a hybrid correlation-driven feature engineering framework for optimized machine learning performance in carbonation depth analysis of concrete subjected to natural environments.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Identification of Selected Physical and Mechanical Properties of Cement Composites Modified with Granite Powder Using Neural Networks.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The addition of powders from waste construction materials as partial cement substitute in concrete represents a significant step toward green concrete construction. High temperatures have a substantial influence on concrete strength, resulting in a reduction in mechanical properties. The prediction of the impacts of waste powders on concrete strength is an important topic in sustainable construction. Such models are needed to understand the complex interactions between waste materials' powders and concrete strength. In this study, three machine learning approaches, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), and M5P, were used for constructing the prediction model for the impact of elevated temperatures on the compressive strength of concrete modified by marble and granite construction waste powders as partial cement replacements in concrete. Dataset of 324 tested cubic specimens with four input variables, waste granite powder dose (GWP), waste marble powder (MWP), temperature (T), and duration (D) were chosen for developing the prediction models. The output was the concrete compressive strength (CS). MWP and GWP ranged between 0 and 9%, temperatures were ranged between 25 °C and 800 °C, and duration up to 2 h. Hyperparameters in the RF and XGB models were optimized using grid search. K-fold cross-validation and several statistical measures, including R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.