ArticleScientific reports2025
The effects of warning design features on risk perception and performance in remote emergency response.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The failure to respond to warnings can have fatal consequences, however, it is a common occurrence for even professional monitoring staff to overlook the warnings. This study developed a set of warning notification designs for remote emergency response and assessed their effectiveness by analyzing the performance and risk perception of monitoring staff through simulation experiments. Sixty participants of safety professionals (42 males and 18 females, Mean age = 28.71) participated in a within-subjects experiment, evaluating warnings with different design features and deciding whether to response. During the experiments, reaction time and task success rate were recorded for each warning task, and subjective scales were used to measure risk perception and response efficacy. The results indicate the positive effect of risk perception on enhancing performance, and demonstrate the impact of warning design features on shaping risk perception and response efficacy. Especially, the roles of warning icon and risk explicitness are emphasized. In addition, situation awareness and mental workload are proved to have positive impact on risk perception, while visual fatigue plays the opposite role. The findings demonstrate the effectiveness of enhancing risk perception and performance of safety monitors by controlling warning design features, contributing to the design of more effective emergency warning interface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.