Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40652050›Full record

ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Peri-implant shaft fractures of the femur and tibia : Classification, diagnostics, treatment and geriatric trauma aspects].

Christopher Lampert, Boris Michael Holzapfel, Wolfgang Böcker, Maximilian Lerchenberger

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher LampertKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Muskuloskelettales Universitätszentrum München (MUM), LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. Christopher.Lampert@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Boris Michael HolzapfelKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Muskuloskelettales Universitätszentrum München (MUM), LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
Wolfgang BöckerKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Muskuloskelettales Universitätszentrum München (MUM), LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
Maximilian LerchenbergerKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Muskuloskelettales Universitätszentrum München (MUM), LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peri-implant fractures of the femur and tibia shaft represent an increasing challenge in the clinical routine due to rising incidence, an aging and multimorbid patient population and often unfavorable postoperative outcomes. This article provides an overview of classification systems, diagnostic approaches and therapeutic strategies, with particular emphasis on aspects relevant to geriatric trauma care. The Vancouver, Lewis-Rorabeck, and Felix classifications form the basis for making treatment decisions in periprosthetic fractures of the femur and tibia. The management is primarily guided by the fracture location, implant stability, and bone quality. In cases of stable implants, locking plate osteosynthesis or intramedullary nailing is commonly used. When prosthetic loosening is present (e.g., Vancouver B2/B3 or Lewis-Rorabeck type III classification), revision arthroplasty is generally required. Interprosthetic fractures represent a distinct biomechanical challenge due to the presence of the implant and necessitate lengthy, locking bridging constructs or, in selected cases, the use of a megaprosthesis. In the context of geriatric trauma care, early mobilization that enables immediate full weight-bearing and interdisciplinary treatment within a certified geriatric trauma center are essential to reduce morbidity, mortality and the level of long-term care needed. Furthermore, the use of cemented stems can reduce the risk of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures. These aspects should be incorporated into the management of geriatric trauma patients to contribute to an improvement in long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

Femoral FracturesPeriprosthetic FracturesTibial FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overFracture Fixation, InternalHumansArthroplastyClassificationGeriatric trauma careOsteosynthesisRevision arthroplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.