Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40652038›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Improving soil water dynamics and crop productivity through conservation tillage in arid regions.

Juan Li, Ziru Niu, Zhen Guo, Jinbin Li, Shenglan Ye, Dongwen Hua

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Juan LiThe Technology Innovation Center for Land Engineering and Human Settlements, Shaanxi Land Engineering Construction Group Co. Ltd and Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China. lijuan8136@163.com.
Ziru NiuThe Technology Innovation Center for Land Engineering and Human Settlements, Shaanxi Land Engineering Construction Group Co. Ltd and Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China.
Zhen GuoKey Laboratory of Cultivated Land Quality Monitoring and Conservation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Xi'an, 710075, China.
Jinbin LiInstitute of Land Engineering and Technology, Shaanxi Provincial Land Engineering Construction Group Co., Ltd, Xi'an, 710075, China.
Shenglan YeThe Technology Innovation Center for Land Engineering and Human Settlements, Shaanxi Land Engineering Construction Group Co. Ltd and Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China.
Dongwen HuaKey Laboratory of Cultivated Land Quality Monitoring and Conservation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Xi'an, 710075, China.

Funding

Shaanxi Province key research and development Plan-key industrial chain project 2022ZDLNY02-04Shaanxi Province Land Engineering Construction Group Internal Scientific Research Project DJNY2024-32Technology Innovation Center for Land Engineering and Human Settlements, Shaanxi Land Engineering Construction Group Co. Ltd and Xi'an Jiaotong University 2021WHZ0093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exploring the impact of different tillage practices on soil moisture retention and crop yield in dryland winter wheat- spring maize rotation on the Loess Plateau is crucial for enhancing rainfall utilization and advancing tillage systems in arid agricultural regions. A long-term field experiment was conducted from 2019 to 2021 in the Weibei dryland area of the Loess Plateau to investigate the effects of conservation tillage. Continuous tillage (CC) was used as the control, with three alternative methods: no-tillage (NN), subsoiling (SS), and a combination of no-tillage and subsoiling (NS). The study assessed the impact of these tillage practices on soil water retention, bulk density, relative chlorophyll content, crop yield, and water use efficiency during both the fallow period and the growing seasons of winter wheat and spring maize. The results revealed the following: (1) All treatments effectively reduced soil bulk density in the 0-60 cm soil layer relative to pre-experiment levels and increased soil porosity. Among the treatments, NS was the most effective, reducing the average bulk density in the 0-60 cm layer by 0.1-0.2 g cm⁻³ and increasing porosity by 2.0-5.5% compared to the other treatments. (2) During the fallow period, tillage treatments significantly enhanced soil water content and storage compared to CC, with NN and NS treatments showing superior water retention effects. (3) In the winter wheat growing season, the average soil water content in the 0-200 cm layer for the NN, SS, and NS treatments was 4.8%, 5.4%, and 3.5% higher than that of CC, respectively. During the spring maize growing season, the increases were 49.3 mm, 17.7 mm, and 36.3 mm, respectively. All tillage treatments resulted in higher soil water storage in the 0-200 cm layer compared to CC, with NN being the most effective during the winter wheat season and SS during the spring maize season. (4) Compared to CC, all tillage treatments improved SPAD values, with NS showing the most significant effect. (5) All treatments increased the yields of both winter wheat and spring maize compared to the control, with increases of 5.4-10.0% for winter wheat and 7.3-18.7% for spring maize. Notably, NS significantly boosted crop yields. Water use efficiency improved by 1.2-6.0% for winter wheat and 5.5-31.3% for spring maize, with SS improving water use efficiency for winter wheat and NS for spring maize. In conclusion, the combination of no-tillage and subsoiling significantly improves soil quality, crop yield, and water use efficiency in the drylands of the Loess Plateau. This makes it a promising tillage practice for the sustainable development of dryland agriculture.

Indexed as

Crop yieldSoil bulk densitySoil moistureSoil water contentSPADWater use efficiency

Identifiers

PMID40652038
PMCPMC12255807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.