ArticleCommunications medicine2025
A cross-national analysis of childhood predictors of daily smoking in adulthood.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrior research on childhood predictors of cigarette smoking tends to focus on the prevalence rather than the quantity of smoking and rarely examined these predictors separately for smokers. Also scarce is cross-national research synthesizing the effects of childhood predictors.
methodsUsing survey data from the Global Flourishing Study of 202,898 adults, weighted to be nationally representative of populations in 21 countries and one territory, we created continuous and binary measures of daily cigarette consumption in adulthood. The binary measure of daily smoking was regressed on childhood and demographic variables for the total sample, and the continuous measure was analyzed for the sample of smokers.
resultsRandom effects meta-analysis provides evidence that childhood maternal and paternal relationship quality (both total and smoker samples), religious service attendance (smoker sample), and being foreign-born (both samples) predict a lower likelihood of adult smoking, whereas being raised by a divorced parent (total sample), having been abused and/or an outsider in the family (both samples), and poor health growing up (both samples) predict a higher likelihood. Although effects are generally weak and mixed in some cases, their direction and strength tend to be consistent between the two samples as well as alternative measures of smoking with some exceptions. Overall, our findings are moderately robust against potential unmeasured confounding, while the effect sizes vary across countries.
conclusionsThe present study offers an important new set of global findings based on a large-scale cross-national study of daily cigarette smoking and country-specific variations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.