Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40652021›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2025

A cross-national analysis of childhood predictors of daily smoking in adulthood.

Sung Joon Jang, Pedro A de la Rosa, R Noah Padgett, Matt Bradshaw, Tyler J VanderWeele, Byron R Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sung Joon JangInstitute for Studies of Religion, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA. Sung_Joon_Jang@baylor.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2228-158X
Pedro A de la RosaInstitute for Culture and Society, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0912-7396
R Noah PadgettHuman Flourishing Program, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Matt BradshawInstitute for Studies of Religion, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.
Tyler J VanderWeeleHuman Flourishing Program, Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6112-0239
Byron R JohnsonInstitute for Studies of Religion, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.

Funding

Fetzer Institute (John E. Fetzer Institute, Inc.) 4354John Templeton Foundation (JTF) 61665Templeton World Charity Foundation (Templeton World Charity Foundation, Inc.) 0605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior research on childhood predictors of cigarette smoking tends to focus on the prevalence rather than the quantity of smoking and rarely examined these predictors separately for smokers. Also scarce is cross-national research synthesizing the effects of childhood predictors.

methodsUsing survey data from the Global Flourishing Study of 202,898 adults, weighted to be nationally representative of populations in 21 countries and one territory, we created continuous and binary measures of daily cigarette consumption in adulthood. The binary measure of daily smoking was regressed on childhood and demographic variables for the total sample, and the continuous measure was analyzed for the sample of smokers.

resultsRandom effects meta-analysis provides evidence that childhood maternal and paternal relationship quality (both total and smoker samples), religious service attendance (smoker sample), and being foreign-born (both samples) predict a lower likelihood of adult smoking, whereas being raised by a divorced parent (total sample), having been abused and/or an outsider in the family (both samples), and poor health growing up (both samples) predict a higher likelihood. Although effects are generally weak and mixed in some cases, their direction and strength tend to be consistent between the two samples as well as alternative measures of smoking with some exceptions. Overall, our findings are moderately robust against potential unmeasured confounding, while the effect sizes vary across countries.

conclusionsThe present study offers an important new set of global findings based on a large-scale cross-national study of daily cigarette smoking and country-specific variations.

Identifiers

PMID40652021
PMCPMC12255748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.