ArticleScientific reports2025
Vibrotactile speech cues are associated with enhanced auditory processing in middle and superior temporal gyri.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Can youImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Combined auditory and tactile stimuli have been found to enhance speech-in-noise perception both in individuals with normal hearing and in those with hearing loss. While behavioral benefits of audio-tactile enhancements in speech understanding have been repeatedly demonstrated, the impact of vibrotactile cues on cortical auditory speech processing remains unknown. Using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) with a dense montage setup, we first identified a region-of-interest highly sensitive to auditory-only speech-in-quiet. In the same region, we then assessed the change in activity ('audio-tactile gains') when presenting speech-in-noise together with a single-channel vibratory signal to the fingertip, congruent with the speech envelope's rate of change. In data from 21 participants with normal hearing, audio-tactile speech elicited on average 20% greater hemodynamic oxygenation changes than auditory-only speech-in-noise within bilateral middle and superior temporal gyri. However, audio-tactile gains did not exceed the sum of the unisensory responses, providing no conclusive evidence of true multisensory integration. Our results support a metamodal theory for the processing of temporal speech features in the middle and superior temporal gyri, providing the first evidence of audio-tactile speech processing in auditory areas using fNIRS. Top-down modulations from somatosensory areas or attention networks likely contributed to the observed audio-tactile gains through temporal entrainment with the speech envelope's rate of change. Further research is needed to understand the neural responses in concordance with their behavioral relevance for speech perception, offering future directions for developing tactile aids for individuals with hearing impairments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.