ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of a machine learning-based nomogram for survival prediction of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma after curative-intent resection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A practical nomogram for predicting survival in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a population-based cohort study.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Association Between Metabolic Syndrome and Long-Term Prognosis in Patients with Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Treated with Curative-Intent Resection: A Multicenter Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (hCCA), a rare cancer of the biliary system, has a poor prognosis. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors affecting the survival of patients with hCCA after curative-intent resection and establish a survival predictive model. Clinical data from 340 hCCA patients who underwent curative-intent resection at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University between 2010 and 2021 were collected. The patients were randomly assigned to a training set and a testing set in a 7:3 ratio. Risk factors selection was performed by five machine learning (ML) algorithms, including Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) Regression, Forward Stepwise Cox regression, Boruta feature selection, Random Forest and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). A nomogram was constructed based on identified risk factors. The independent risk factors for the postoperative survival in hCCA patients included positive margin, lymph node metastasis, low total lymph node count (TLNC) and poor tumor differentiation. In the training and testing sets, the consistency index (C-index) of ML-based nomogram was 0.731 (95% CI: 0.684-0.753) and 0.714 (95% CI: 0.661-0.775), while the 3-year AUC of the nomogram was 0.784 (95% CI: 0.724-0.844) and 0.770 (95% CI: 0.763-0.867), respectively. The calibration curves for the nomogram showed good concordance. Based on the decision curve analysis, the nomogram had a good clinical application value, outperforming both the TNM staging system and the Bismuth-Corlette classification. Furthermore, patients were stratified into three groups with varying risks of overall survival (OS): the low-risk, middle-risk and high-risk group according to the nomogram, with statistically significant differences observed among these groups (p < 0.001). The ML-based nomogram provided a personalized prognostic prediction model for hCCA patients after surgical resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.