Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40652010›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Prediction of gastrointestinal hemorrhage in cardiology inpatients using an interpretable XGBoost model.

Yahui Li, Xujie Wang, Xuhui Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yahui LiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Hubei Key Laboratory of Genetics and Molecular Mechanisms of Cardiological Disorders, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Xujie WangDepartment of Emergency ICU, The Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, China.
Xuhui LiuDepartment of Neurology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, 82 Cuiyingmen, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, 730030, Gansu, China. liuxuhui_1995@yeah.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) occurs more frequently in cardiovascular patients than in the general population, significantly affecting morbidity and mortality. However, existing predictive models often lack sufficient accuracy and interpretability. We developed an interpretable and practical machine learning model to predict the risk of GIB in cardiology inpatients. This retrospective study analyzed electronic health records of 10,706 patients admitted to the Department of Cardiology at the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University from October 8, 2019, to October 30, 2024. Variables with > 30% missing data were excluded, leaving 35 potential predictors. The dataset was randomly split into a training cohort (80%, n = 9,356) and a test cohort (20%, n = 2,340). GIB occurred in 110 patients (1.03%). Ten variables were identified as the strongest predictors: hemoglobin (importance score: 0.16), creatinine (0.12), D-dimer (0.10), NT-proBNP (0.06), glucose (0.06), white blood cell count (0.06), body weight (0.06), serum albumin (0.04), urea (0.04), and age (0.04). Among seven machine learning classifiers, XGBoost performed best, with an AUC of 0.995 in the validation cohort. In the validation set, the model achieved an accuracy of 0.975, sensitivity of 0.769, and specificity of 0.996. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis confirmed hemoglobin, creatinine, and D-dimer as the top contributors to GIB risk. The model demonstrated excellent calibration (Brier score = 0.016), and decision curve analysis supported its clinical utility across various risk thresholds. The XGBoost model offers high accuracy and interpretability in predicting GIB risk among cardiology inpatients. It holds promise for clinical decision support by enabling early risk identification and personalized prevention strategies.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal HemorrhageAgedAged, 80 and overBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsFemaleHemoglobinsHumansInpatientsMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsHemoglobinsCardiovascular diseaseGastrointestinal hemorrhageInterpretabilityMachine learningXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID40652010
PMCPMC12255804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.