Trial reportScientific reports2025
The role of virtual reality-based cognitive training in enhancing motivation and cognitive functions in individuals with chronic stroke.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Motor and Cognitive Telerehabilitation for Acquired Brain Injury
Mind in Motion: Assessing the Efficacy of Virtual Reality Cognitive Training in Neurodivergent Children With Autism
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Virtual Reality Sensing Technologies in Student Soccer Training: A Systematic Review of Tracking Systems and Perceptual-Cognitive, Physical, Tactical, and Educational Outcomes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Benefits of virtual reality rehabilitation on neurodegenerative diseases: a systematic review.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Cognitive Impairment and Psychological Morbidity Among Stroke Survivors in Rehabilitation: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Innovating Stroke Recovery: A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality in Cognitive Rehabilitation.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stroke represents a major health challenge worldwide, often resulting in significant long-term disability that affects cognitive, motor, and emotional functions. Rehabilitation strategies that enhance patient motivation are crucial for improving outcomes. This randomized controlled trial investigated the impact of Virtual Reality Rehabilitation Systems (VRRS) compared to traditional cognitive training on motivation, cognitive recovery, and emotional state in post-stroke patients. Fifty-four adults with chronic stroke were randomized into two equal groups (27 participants per group). The experimental group received 24 sessions of Virtual Reality (VR) cognitive training, while the control group underwent 24 sessions of traditional cognitive rehabilitation. Motivation was assessed using the McClelland test, while cognitive and emotional states were evaluated using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Hamilton Rating Scales for Anxiety and Depression (HAM-A, HAM-D). The experimental group exhibited significant improvements in motivation, with marked increases in Achievement (T0: 68.41 ± 15.81, T1: 68.93 ± 15.80; p < 0.001) and Affiliation(T0: 60.67 ± 14.64, T1: 60.93 ± 15.59; p = 0.006) dimensions, alongside enhanced cognitive function (T0: 24.781 ± 1.89, T1: 26 (24.5-27); p = 0.001), reduced depressive (T0: 41 ± 2.32, T1: 6 (4-8); p = 0.003) and anxiety symptoms (T0: 4.26 ± 1.99, T1: 3.30 ± 1.94; p < 0.001). The Control Group showed significant differences only in MOCA (T0: 25 (23-26.5), T1: 25 (24-27); p < 0.001). Between-group analysis revealed no significant differences between the two groups. These findings underscore the potential of VR as a multifaceted tool to boost motivation, facilitate cognitive recovery, and improve emotional state, offering a comprehensive approach to post-stroke rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.