ArticleScientific reports2025
Application of deep reinforcement learning in parameter optimization and refinement of turbulence models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the field of computational fluid dynamics, the accuracy of turbulence models is crucial. The aim of this study is to improve the accuracy of simulations by optimizing turbulence model parameters, in order to address the cost and time limitations of traditional wind tunnel tests and on-site measurements. Based on the SST (Shear Stress Transport) k-ω turbulence model, this article proposed a parameter optimization method for turbulence models based on DDPG (Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient). Using wind pressure coefficient (WPC) simulation as an example. Numerical simulation of complex building wind fields was achieved using OpenFOAM software, and sensitivity analysis of model parameters was conducted. Key parameters that significantly affected simulation results were identified, and GPR (Gaussian Process Regression) was established as a surrogate model to fit the initial CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) simulation data. The DDPG algorithm was used for parameter optimization, and model parameters were gradually adjusted to minimize wind pressure simulation errors. The experimental results showed that in a single wind direction angle, the average, Root Mean Square (RMS), maximum, and minimum values of the DDPG optimized WPC were closer to the actual WPC. In the set wind direction angle of 0°-50°, the simulated WPC after DDPG optimization was closer to the actual WPC than before optimization. The DDPG optimization method significantly reduced the MAE (Mean Absolute Error) and RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) of the WPC, and its optimization effect was significantly better than the GA (Genetic Algorithm) and PSO (Particle Swarm Optimization) methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.