Trial reportEuropean urology oncology2025
Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Presurgical Androgen Deprivation Therapy With or Without Axitinib in Prostate Cancer Presenting With Lymph Node Metastasis.
Trial report in European urology oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveStrategies that combine systemic and locoregional therapies are increasingly used in prostate cancer (PC) with lymph node metastasis (LNM) at presentation. We investigated whether the presurgical combination of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and the antiangiogenic agent axitinib would be more effective than ADT alone in achieving time off systemic therapy after surgery in these patients.
methodsPatients with newly diagnosed PC with either clinically detected LNM (cTxN1M0 or cTxNxM1a) or at very high risk for subclinical LNM were treated with ADT for 2 mo and then randomized 2:1 to addition of axitinib to ADT versus continuing ADT alone for an additional 4 mo before surgery and discontinuation of systemic therapy. The primary endpoint was the rate of freedom from treatment failure in the intention-to-treat population at 1 yr postoperatively ("success"). Failure was defined as prostate-specific antigen >1.0 ng/ml, objective progression, or initiation of additional treatment. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the 73 patients accrued, 49 received axitinib + ADT and 24 received ADT alone. Of the 49 patients who had surgery on protocol, success was achieved in 26, of whom 22 received axitinib + ADT and four received ADT alone. In the node-positive group of 55 patients, the success rate was 36.8% (95% credible interval [CrI] 22.5-52.5%) for axitinib + ADT and 19.0% (95% CrI 5.7-37.9%) for ADT alone; the probability of a higher success rate with axitinib + ADT was 0.935. The median time to progression was 9.8 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.6-17.4) with axitinib + ADT versus 5.7 mo (95% CI 4.0-11.3) with ADT alone (p = 0.03). Pathologic responses, time to metastatic progression, and overall survival were similar between the arms. There were no grade 4-5 toxicities or unexpected perioperative complications. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In patients with newly diagnosed PC with LNM, a presurgical strategy that combines axitinib + ADT was feasible and was more likely than ADT alone to achieve significant time off treatment. However, the overall efficacy was limited, suggesting that patient selection and more effective combinations are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.