ReviewSeminars in nephrology2025
Using Large Genomic Biobanks to Generate Insights into Genetic Kidney Disease.
Review in Seminars in nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hepatic manifestations of ciliopathies: genetic causes and clinical update.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Bibliometric analysis of Alport syndrome: genetic foundations, clinical implications, and the transition to precision medicine.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- 'Missing' disease-causing variants in Alport syndrome.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects approximately 9% of the global population, leading to increased risks of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), cardiovascular disease (CVD), and mortality. Patients with CKD are a huge burden on health care resources globally. CKD is a complex condition influenced by a combination of genetic, environmental, and traditional risk factors. Family studies have suggested heritability rates for CKD ranging from 30% to 75%, and large genomic biobank studies have proven essential in identifying genes with substantial effects on CKD risk and in capturing cumulative genetic risk through polygenic risk scores. These biobanks are crucial for discovering new genes associated with kidney health and disease, and their growing size enhances the power to detect novel genetic associations. Integrating multi-omics technologies such as transcriptomics, metabolomics, and proteomics further enriches our understanding of CKD, while advanced computational tools continue to expand our insights into genetic data. Polygenic risk scores, derived from hundreds of genetic variants with small effect sizes, can help identify individuals at high risk of CKD. Genomic biobanks offer valuable opportunities for early identification and personalized treatment of monogenic kidney disorders, such as autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and Alport syndrome. These biobanks help fill knowledge gaps, particularly in individuals with milder or asymptomatic presentations who are often underrepresented in traditional studies. Expanding genomic biobank efforts globally, especially in diverse populations, is vital to enhancing our understanding of the genetic underpinnings of kidney disease. This review highlights the significant contributions of genomic biobanks to advancing our comprehension of the genetics of CKD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.