Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40651540›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of pathology2025

From Single-Cancer to Pan-Cancer Prognosis: A Multimodal Deep Learning Framework for Survival Analysis with Robust Generalization Capability.

Binyu Zhang, Shichao Li, Junpeng Jian, Xiaoyu Ren, Ziqi Zhao, Limei Guo, Fei Su, Zhu Meng, Zhicheng Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Machine Learning Models for Predicting Pain, Fatigue, Depression, Anxiety, and Malnutrition in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. AI-assisted multimodal data integration for precision oncology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Binyu ZhangSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.
Shichao LiSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.
Junpeng JianSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.
Xiaoyu RenSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.
Ziqi ZhaoDepartment of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Limei GuoDepartment of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Fei SuSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Network System and Network Culture, Beijing, China.
Zhu MengSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Network System and Network Culture, Beijing, China. Electronic address: bamboo@bupt.edu.cn.
Zhicheng ZhaoSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Network System and Network Culture, Beijing, China. Electronic address: zhaozc@bupt.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prognosis represents a critical component in oncology research, enabling personalized treatment planning and optimized health care resource use. Although existing prognostic models demonstrate promising performance on restricted data sets, they remain constrained by two limitations: modality-specific architectural designs and cancer type-specific training paradigms that hinder cross-domain generalization. To address these challenges, the Unified Multimodal Pan-Cancer Survival Network (UMPSNet) was introduced, which integrated histopathology images, genomic expression profiles, and four metadata categories through structured text templates. UMPSNet used the optimal transport-based attention for multimodal feature alignment and a guided mixture of expert mechanisms to address cancer-type distribution shifts. Comprehensive evaluation across 3523 whole slide images (n = 2831) spanning five The Cancer Genome Atlas cohorts demonstrated superior predictive performance (mean concordance index = 0.725), surpassing meticulously designed single-cancer models. Notably, in zero-shot transfer evaluation involving 392 pancreatic adenocarcinoma whole slide images (n = 66) from Peking University Third Hospital, UMPSNet achieved a concordance index of 0.652 without parameter fine-tuning, demonstrating generalization capacity for previously unseen malignancies. Additionally, UMPSNet identified prognostic gene signatures that consistently overlapped with clinically detected mutations (n = 92) while revealing novel gene candidates, validating its clinical relevance and providing complementary insights for precision oncology. Thus, the UMPSNet framework established a new paradigm for multimodal survival analysis by overcoming data heterogeneity and domain shift challenges, thereby providing a clinically adaptable tool for pan-cancer prognostic prediction.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeoplasmsHumansPrognosisSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID40651540
PMCPMC12597545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.