Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40651147›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2025

Molecular characteristics by race and ethnicity of patients with high tumor mutational burden, high microsatellite instability, and mismatch repair deficiency: Real-world data from the multi-institutional Endometrial cancer Molecularly Targeted Therapy Consortium (ECMT2).

Sarah S Lee, Angeles Alvarez Secord, Steven Friedman, Erinn M Hade, Carson Smitherman, Nikita Bisht, Lindsay Borden, Amanda L Jackson, Floor Backes, Premal Thaker and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Sarah S LeeDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: sarah.lee@nyulangone.org.
Angeles Alvarez SecordDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States.
Steven FriedmanDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Erinn M HadeDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Carson SmithermanDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States.
Nikita BishtDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, United States.
Lindsay BordenDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Amanda L JacksonDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Floor BackesDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Premal ThakerDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Rebecca ArendDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Jason D WrightDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States.
Bradley CorrDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Health Center, Aurora, CO, United States.
Emily KoDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Gottfried KonecnyDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Sarah PodwikaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Victoria Bae-JumpDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Kari E HackerDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, United States.
Bhavana PothuriDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

Project-005UL1TR001445 · NCATS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BREDELLA, MIRIAM ANTOINETTE, HOCHMAN, JUDITH S · 2015 to 2025
$103.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), high microsatellite instability (MSI-H), and high tumor mutation burden (TMB-H) are predictive and prognostic biomarkers in endometrial cancer. We aimed to characterize the racial/ethnic distribution of molecular markers and the clinical characteristics among endometrial cancer patients with TMB-H and MSI-H/dMMR.

methodsThe Endometrial Cancer Molecularly Targeted Therapy Consortium is a centrally verified clinical and molecular repository. Patients with endometrial cancer who underwent tumor profiling were included. TMB-H was defined as ≥10-12 mutations per megabase. MSI-H was determined by next-generation sequencing or polymerase chain reaction, and dMMR by loss of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2 on immunohistochemistry. Tumor biomarker positivity was defined as TMB-H and/or MSI-H/dMMR. Overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models.

resultsAmong 742 patients, 22 % (n = 164) were biomarker positive: 12 % (n = 87) had both TMB-H and MSI-H/dMMR, 8 % (n = 63) had MSI-H/dMMR alone, and 2 % (n = 14) had 14 TMB-H alone. Only 9 % of non-Hispanic Black patients had biomarker positive tumors compared to 26 % of patients from other racial/ethnic groups. Pathogenic POLE mutations were rare (<1 %, n = 5). Patients with TMB-H had a higher proportion of high-risk histologies (43 %) than those with MSI-H/dMMR (24 %). Biomarker positive tumors were associated with a lower risk of death compared to biomarker negative tumors (aHR 0.63, 95 % CI: 0.46, 0.88).

conclusionLess than 10 % of non-Hispanic Black patients with endometrial cancer had TMB-H and/or MSI-H/dMMR, and biomarker positivity was associated with improved survival. Prospective studies are necessary to elucidate how these molecular differences impact treatment and outcomes.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEndometrial NeoplasmsMicrosatellite InstabilityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsDNA Mismatch RepairFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMutationNeoplastic Syndromes, HereditaryBiomarkers, TumorEndometrial cancerMicrosatellite instabilityMismatch, repair deficiencyTumor mutational burden

Identifiers

PMID40651147
PMCPMC12415845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.